President Bush Pardons One of His Own

"They're certainly better than the names the vice president suggested, which was 'lunch' and 'dinner [Ed.-And 'Leahy" and 'Go Fuck Yourself'].' "
--President George W. Bush today.

The White House--Standing next to two turkeys (his aides), the Turkey-in-Chief pardoned his own kind: "That'll learn ya," said the president, patting the one called "May"on its posterior. The other turkey--not Bush or his father--was named "Flower," both receiving their official appellations by a poll. Mr. President had better save those pardons for a rainy day, and that day is coming ('WAR IS OVER-if you want it"). Was Benjamin Franklin telling us something when he said he wanted the turkey to be the national bird? The Turkeys still have problems with those wily Kurds, however, and insist on flocking into Northern Iraq--where they are subsequently caught, plucked, cooked, and eaten by the PKK with some local garnish. At least Larry Flynt could openly-admit he sexed a fowl. Do you know the difference between big wood and brush? Both of the turkeys are from Indiana, it's true. Since each is from Jasper, they could not possibly be Evan Bayh or Dick Lugar (maybe Barbara Boxer, since she won't investigate David Vitter for some strange reason, but that's a bird of a different defense complex feather). The number three: that's odd, but we'll all Sunday go ta' meetin' anyways.

WRITER Knows that Radar and Bigheaddc Knows That You Know That I Know They are Failing to Save Face

"Sen. Vitter needs to do everything he can to avoid becoming a sound bite, and it would be best if he said nothing." --An anonymous GOP Senate aide.

WWW--I'm sending this e-mail off to Rob Capriccioso in a few moments, and these are going to be my last words on this whole affair wherein Rob and Radar's Editor John Cook thought they had a "big one." They didn't, and if they don't believe Ms. Palfrey is lying in her assertion that Sam Donaldson's presence in her now-defunct escort service's phone records has no significance, then what do they really assert?

To save face, I recommend the following constructive suggestion: start doing some real investigating of the people in the shadows who were her real clients, and drop the gossip. It should be noted here that none of this is to suggest that Ms. Palfrey was running a prostitution ring--that's not a necessary component.

What's very likely is that Senator David Vitter and others solicited her subcontractors to engage in acts that would constitute prostitution. There has been no trial yet, and Ms. Palfrey must be presumed innocent until proven guilty under our system of justice (or what's left of it). Go after the leads in the case of Ronald Roughead (and possibly his brother, CNO Gary Roughead), Randall L. Tobias, and Senator David Vitter.

Many in the GOP, fearing political consequences, want Vitter to fight the subpoena or refuse to answer questions by invoking Fifth Amendment protection from self-incrimination. Vitter has yet to say whether he will fight the subpoena. ...Vitter's allies contend the record already shows Vitter had an alleged taste for the high-priced escorts, particularly Paula Neble, so there is nothing he can add that can help Palfrey. (New York Daily News, 11.17.2007)

Of course, they would know, wouldn't they? Especially considering some of them could be--or individuals associated with them--are still to be uncovered in the phone records, and if there was actually some substantial investigation occurring by those with the means to do so. Instead, we get Sam Donaldson rooked into all of this because of some misdialing, but the show still had to go on at Radar and Bigheaddc. As a result, their behavior has all the appearance of being just like the corrupt, lazy, and apathetic mainstream press. While people are attempting to cover their asses, the bad-guys are getting away (presumably with murder in many cases).


The e-mail to Rob Capriccioso:

Dear Rob:

I'm posting this e-mail at my site:

I've read your piece, and in fairness, I am giving you some benefit of the doubt. However, simply because you've done hours of interviews with Palfrey does not support your thesis, and I'm skeptical there will be any follow-up explanations. In fact, nothing in the posting 'Blogger Thinks We Think Palfrey Is Lying; He’s Wrong,' supports the contentions that there was ever a worthwhile story here. It's my opinion that you're not seeing the forest for the trees, but you're hardly alone on this.

Of course ABC mishandled the phone records and behaved suspiciously, that's been obvious since May. Certainly, there is a strong likelihood that they were concerned about their ranks being in the records as well. But what of it? This is the same media that carried this administration's water--almost to the man and woman--and got us into this absurd and illegal war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Do you think your efforts are going to make any real difference?

ABC's not the real story, and Ms. Palfrey confirmed my thesis that there was no story with Sam Donaldson in the phone records and that you jumped the gun on all of this. She has confirmed my assertions in correspondence as being "spot-on." You contend that you don't believe she lying, which makes no sense in this context at all. You need to be watching real clients of her phone records, like Senator David Vitter, Ret. Army Colonel Ronald Roughead (US Navy CNO Rear Admiral Gary Roughead's brother), and even a fellow named Mark Capansky, a former intern of Pennsylvania Rep. Bob Goodlatte. You also need to be looking into affairs at Annapolis, a short drive for you and your associates. You're too interested in the easy fix and the smut side of the story, and the ABC story is very likely a red herring, a dead end. We can all do better than this.

I could be wrong, but you're acting just as ABC did last Spring: only being interested in the "big names," the smut or salacious side of the story, and not really interested at all in getting-to-the-bottom of the whole affair. I assume a lot of this is for the sake of brevity--it takes explaining a story of genuine significance, and the rewards are often meagre. I will not disrespect you by calling you a journalist, as it's not a good thing to be called these days.

Thanks to all this running-in-place by the press and bloggers, Senator Vitter can now be replaced with a Republican appointed by Louisiana's new Republican Governor, Bobby Jindal. However, it's possible now that the GOP's incumbents in the Senate are going to turn on Vitter because of this fact. Will Vitter's counsel move to quash the subpoena? That's likely, but it doesn't mean it's going to be successful. We can only wait and see how Judge Kessler will rule on this.

Why you continue to assert that there is something to the Donaldson story puzzles me, but that's for others to find-out and publish, I'm done with this sideshow. This is a very broad scandal with implications that strike to the core of our political and economic system. As someone living around Washington D.C., you need to start hitting the pavement and tracking-down the real clients of Pamela Martin & Associates. You're hardly alone in being distracted from what is likely the real focus of the story: specific clients like Vitter, Tobias, Roughead, Capansky, and others who haven't been uncovered yet, but who are probably the cause of the whole scandal.

I was in close-communication with Ms. Palfrey during the aftermath of the ABC debacle, and I can tell you that it's more about the people who own the network and their representatives in Congress and elsewhere in the political sectors of this country. Perhaps you agree, but clinging to the Donaldson story isn't necessarily going to get to the heart of things at the network. There is definitely more than enough smoke implicating the role of lobbyists in the Palfrey case as well. ABC's ownership made the decision not to report on a number of individuals, not merely Sam Donaldson.

There were hints very early-on that there might be journalists in there, and possibly even some from ABC--the contention isn't new. I'm frankly uninterested in the quick-fix school of journalism which takes the view of what sells best as factoid news, a rush towards bringing in those advertising dollars. ABC's Brian Ross and his producers fought a hard battle with ownership and lost, and there are stories of yelling matches at the network. That's something to think about. Accountability: it's not just for breakfast anymore. Make us proud and start hitting the bad-guys.

The New York Daily News, 11.17.2007:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2007/11/17/2007-11-17_republicans_urge_politican_to_stay_quiet.html

11.20.2007: PS to Rob--I'm a writer, not a blogger. One might wonder why Rob won't return my e-mails anymore, but I don't. He's already dug a deep enough hole with all of this.

Songs from the Site Meter: Vice President Cheney or Darth Vader?

Gresham, Nebraska--Is this the VP hiding in his secured terrorist bunker? You tell me, man. Hopefully the Russians are recalibrating their ballistic missile systems on this fixed-coordinate-point (if he's there).

Domain Name		ufcoop.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address		67.63.66.# (STE Wireless)
ISP		DARK FIBER SOLUTIONS
Location		Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Nebraska City : Gresham Lat/Long : 41.0395, -97.3874 (Map)
Language		English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System		Microsoft WinXP
Browser		Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Javascript		version 1.3
Monitor		Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit		Nov 17 2007 5:13:47 am
Last Page View		Nov 17 2007 5:33:22 am
Visit Length		19 minutes 35 seconds
Page Views		4
Referring URL		http://www.google.co...e&btnG=Google Search
Search Engine		google.com
Search Words		paula neble
Visit Entry Page		http://chickasawpick...r-visit-from-dr.html
Visit Exit Page		http://chickasawpick...r-visit-from-dr.html
Out Click		DC Phone List search those records & publish your findings, it's legal! http://www.dcphonelist.com/
Time Zone		UTC-6:00
Visitor's Time		Nov 16 2007 4:13:47 pm
Visit Number		23,548

They've Dug-Up Indiana Serial Killer, Belle Gunness

Forest Park, Illinois/Laporte, Indiana--I'm about 10-15 miles from the location of the Gunness farm, the site on McClung Road where as many as 40 murders by the infamous Belle Gunness took place. Gunness was a hulking, ugly Norwegian immigrant woman who placed ads in big city papers (nearly all Norwegian-language, so as to attract others of her ethnicity) to lure rich widowers to her home to be dispatched.

She sometimes took-out insurance policies on the men--often widowers--if they didn't have much to steal, and murdered them with poison in their coffee or tea. After that, she dismembered some of their bodies with an ax. Legend has it that the men flocked to her like flies to honey, which is strange since she was incredibly ugly.

Why the disinterment last week? A farm hand who was jailed after the 1908 fire at the Gunness farm contended that the murderer got away. After that, there were the obligatory sightings, but no solid-proof of his assertion.

With current DNA technology, we're probably going to find-out. There are a few letters known to have been sent by Gunness to some parties that has traces of her DNA on them, and are going to be matched with the now disinterred-corpse. All that's left are the bones, naturally, but there's going to be some DNA left in either the teeth, or within some of the other bones. There has been a legend attached to the story: that the corpse found in the burning embers of the farm house weighed too little to be her, and that it was headless.

In addition, there is a story that one of Gunness's domestics went missing at that time, and that someone's head was found in a cornfield nearby the ruins. What does it mean? What's the veracity of this legend? From the above image, it appears that the corpse in Gunness's grave has a skull. Sometimes the truth about the "Black widow," the "Lady Bluebeard" isn't so sexy, considering her girth and dour appearance. It should be of no surprise that there are women who kill. There's more than corn in Indiana.

http://laportecountyhistory.org/
http://laportecountyhistory.org/belleg1.htm

60,000 Reagan Library Artifacts Missing: A Reflection

Simi Valley, California--Think about it--who must have stolen it all? I personally wouldn't want any of it and would never visit the library unless it was over an FOIA. It was REPUBLICANS (pedophiles) who stole the majority of it, let's be frank. Doesn't that really say it all? Who else would want any of it if they weren't an exorcist? In order to downplay these facts--that 3/4's of the artifact collection are now gone--the media told us that '20,000 are missing.' But the library belongs at its current location: where all the dirty, racist L.A. cops live, the hottest part of the greater Los Angeles area. They say it's hot as hell there. I was in Chicago once and saw a hologram of his head--the detail was so amazing you could discern his lack of intelligence. He also had a bad case of dandruff the day the holographic photo was taken. At least his kids figured it out: he was always a simple, wrong-headed dope who should have remained as a minor actor or a lifeguard. He was generally an absentee father. What a goofy Maoist cult ya'll have there. He was a much better actor as president. OK, you got me: immigration is bad, his ancestors should never have been allowed into America. That'll learn ya.'

The New Devil's Dictionary: Advertising

Advertising, n-A modern affliction commonly misconstrued as innocuous, but really qualifies as business propaganda. The medium of the modern age, immersing as many as it can in its nexus of control and channeling, towards the destruction of independent will, thought, and imagination.

The end of culture and the primary tool in the drive towards a total ecological and anthropological-catastrophe for the sake of power. A form of propaganda born out of the Information Bureaus of WWI, with contributions towards psychological manipulations coming from Edward Bernays (at top left), the nephew of Sigmund Freud.

Advertising frequently portrays human beings in situations, doing and saying things a human being would never do or say. Current copyright legislation prevents the public from the sampling and recontextualization (and dissemination) of advertising materials as an antidote through artistic works, and in every medium. A lie predicated on inducing a person to buy something that they don't want or need, to rob them of their money.

All of this is meant to rob the individual of their past, and therefore their values, principles, and their very identity. Government approved mind control towards the pacification of the public mind. Control comes from an exchange between the ownership of production, coming through the commodity itself, and flowing- out from the individual. An ocean of lies. Also utilized in the control of information in publications, websites, television, and other forms of media which are starved of governmental funds that are routinely funneled into corporations without so much as a blink. Institutionalized disempowerment, robbing the individual of the ability to see the bars of their own cage.

A method taken-up by business to socialize generation-after-generation improperly. The monstrous distraction of this era, yet taken as normal because of its ubiquity. The closest example today of human evil since the Holocaust, and once copied by the National Socialism (Nazism) for their own propaganda models. The ruination of all that is sacred in human life for the sake of the marterialist-Shibboleth called consumerism, destroying: friendship, love between two souls, human memory, brotherhood, solidarity, trust, faith, and hope.

Prosecutors in Palfrey Case Refuse Once Again to Present List of Accusers or Any Evidence for Pretrial Hearings

Washington D.C.--In a repeat performance from June 5th of this year, the government's prosecution has refused to provide the names of the women (and anyone else, not even military strategist Harlan Ullman or "Jennifer," a former employee of high powered law firm Akin Gump) testifying against Deborah Jeane Palfrey, with an impending hearing for discovery slated for November 28th. The public has the right to know this, and other evidence the prosecution has, as does the defendant.

Some have presumed that the defense is aware of who all the accusers are, and while this is likely to be true overall, there could still be some surprises. Other interesting events occurred on that same day of June 5th: Ms. Palfrey's ailing mother was confronted at her Florida home by agents of the IRS and the Justice Department just minutes after Palfrey had left the residence for a visit.

This means these federal agents were lying-in-wait at a very close proximity, making for some possibly humorous imagery. One can imagine a gaggle of these individuals hiding in the brush somewhere, or chewing on donuts and gum in their vehicles paid for by the average American taxpayer. Maybe they were just bored and impatient. Predictably, they aren't explaining their investigative procedures (or legal demeanor), and they're still not telling....anything at all. Considering how bumbling they all come-off, they might not want anyone to know what their actual investigative procedure entails--and certainly not the federal grand jury. It's unknown whether the jury is aware of the backgrounds of Palfrey's accusers or not, though it's doubtful.

It should also be noted that on-or-around June 5th the pseudo story that Dick Cheney "might" be in the phone records of Pamela Martin & Associates was trotted-out by the poorly-dressed Wayne Madsen. This writer ponders whether Madsen will ever reveal any of his sources, though it's also doubtful. Dissemination of the "Cheney story" was immediate and nearly ubiquitous. The week centering around was an awfully active one, wasn't it? Why it was gulped-up by far too many sites, blogs, and even some of the mainstream media is probably a matter of economics. Again, just another quick-fix that leads nowhere and means nothing, smelling more like disinformation than anything else. But since it brings in so many hits to a site, it's considered valuable. This is a point of vulnerability that legitimate and sincere sites should be considering...

And so, in this context it should be considered by all that Ret. Colonel Ronald Roughead (of SAIC) ran propaganda operations through the IMN (Iraqi Media Network), a fact that is pregnant with possibilities. It appears some of his work at SAIC focuses on "terrorist" activities on the internet and the dissemination of information. Surely, he's acquainted with affecting the flow of information, and could possibly be involved in activities on the web meant to isolate and channel information damaging to himself and his brother. He's got the skills and the resources, and considering the anarchic era we're in, it's not unlikely that he's been using them, having an entire crew to work with. In the private sector, this might not be illegal, unless it was work being done under a government contract, then the rules could be very different.

But according to the mainstream media--and even so-called "progressive" publications, sites, and blogs--none of this is important. Either the story isn't important (Corn's likely assertion), or maybe she's "lying. This appears to be John Cook's (Radar) and Larisa Alexandrovna's (Rawstory) contention. Just ask David Corn of the Nation. On this note, you can kiss your credibility goodbye, Mr. Corn. Either you're incredibly naive, or you might just be protecting people of the same class. Something is blinding many of you in the press to the possibilities of this story, and this writer believes many of you have been had.

Perhaps its a matter of professional loyalty to one's peers, which this writer rejects wholly. Do you really want to end this war and this criminal presidential administration or not? What's obvious is that Ret. Colonel Ron's brother Rear Admiral Gary Roughead--or someone under his command--has been searching the internet on the story relating to themselves, and from various geographic locations from U.S. Navy ISPs. Rear Admiral Gary Roughead is the current CNO of the entire U.S. Naval Fleets, but obviously this isn't newsworthy.

All of this is documented elsewhere on this site. Considering that one of the women testifying against Palfrey that she engaged in prostitution for Pamela Martin & Associates is still serving as a supply officer at Annapolis, and you could have a very real case of conflict of interest regarding the Roughead connection. But that kind of a relationship seems to be at the heart of the entire affair, and this is the second Bush era, after all. British military authorities shot Mata Hari for reporting information on the British tanks before the Battle of the Somme in 1916, tipping-off the Germans. Are similar actions being expedited in Washington thanks to the corruption and incompetence of those sworn to protect us?

Well duh II: What Happened Between Bigheaddc and Radar?

The worthless mainstream media/Washington D.C.--Right, Sam Donaldson IS in the phone records of Deborah Jeane Palfrey's defunct Pamela Martin & Associates, but it isn't significant. Have you ever dialed the wrong-number before? Sam's relatives did, since one of Palfrey's numbers was one-digit off from Donaldson's, so she kept getting calls from them, and over-and-over again.

Cue Radar magazine's site editor John Cook and an overzealous Rob Capriccioso of Bigheaddc.com who thought they had a major scoop that required virtually no investment and could bring in those advertising dollars.

A source close to the story has confirmed that there was no story to begin with. But they went and ran it anyway, and have now turned on each other claiming different stories. Readers should note that they both appear to be contending that Palfrey is lying, which is pretty low of them considering she's a defendant. That's how it goes in this story--guilty until proven innocent, a curiously un-American contention that runs-through the affair labeled "Hookergate" by the mainstream press. This comment was posted by this writer at Radaronline.com's page for the article "Donaldson's Digits: Wrong Number" at 1:50PM today, though I doubt it's getting put up, it is unedited:

Right, pretty vague information in those missives posted by Mr. Cook and Capriccioso. Here's what I have good reason to believe transpired, and from a source directly involved in the whole mess:Because of the salacious side of Ms. Palfrey's legal predicament, there is a class of journalists and bloggers who tend to fixate on the "prostitution" aspects, rather than the real story--the political side.

But no, instead we have the usual laziness of trying to find the "big names," when that's not the real story at all. What's the real story? We don't know all of it yet, but outlines are beginning to appear. But that means work, real investigative work, not an easy fix like a Sam Donaldson. What of the others in the records of Ms. Palfrey's former escort service?

The best example is one I and an anonymous commenter (I believe at Firedoglake) discovered in the phone records of Pamela Martin & Associates back in July (yes, July!): one Ronald Roughead (703-836-0522, Cingular 2005) who is probably still employed by SAIC, one of the most successful contractors to the defense and intelligence communities, and who even have some tangential connections to the Randy 'Duke' Cunningham scandal. This connection come from associates of Cunningham's co-conspirator, Brent Wilkes.

It should be noted here that former House Speaker Dennis Hastert was mentioned in the trial of Wilkes in recent weeks by Wilkes' nephew. Also, it should be noted that Mr. Roughead is brother to Rear Admiral Gary Roughead, current Bush appointed CNO of the entire Naval Fleets of the US! But, according to the LA Times, Gannett, USA Today, and sundry other outlets, this isn't newsworthy. Ask yourselves why Ronald Roughead is in the records.

I have posted information about Mr., Roughead on Bigheaddc's comments section (of which I am now unable to access), and there has been no follow-up on it as far as I can tell. No, instead, we get Sam Donaldson and other such items of gossip--presumably to elicit more hits and more advertising dollars to Radar and Bigheaddc, the whole point of the rush to run the Donaldson pseudo-story.

Again, what happened between Radar and Bighead? They wanted the SMUT, but Ms. Palfrey wasn't going to confirm it to Mr. Capriccioso, so he went and submitted the story anyway. But there was a problem of confirmation: Deborah Jeane Palfrey. She's not going to confirm it because there was never a story to begin with. Her assertions are true, while those of Radar and Bighead are not. They wanted a story that was an easy fix, didn't get it, and went and ran it anyway. Now they have to do the clean-up.

The real job is find those culprits like Ret. Colonel Ronald Roughead (the people who expedite the atrocities of our day in the safety of the shadows), the real players with the security clearances who have called Ms. Palfrey's service (or vice versa).

A great face-saving gesture on-the-part of Mr. Cook and Mr. Capriccioso would be to get-up and drive to 1200 First Street, Alexandria, Virginia where Mr. Roughead lives and confront him. You might want to break the news to his wife, however. Did he phone escort services in Iraq when he ran the IMN (Iraq Media Network)? Roughead is likely a propaganda chief, so maybe that explains some of the bumbling on the internet...

CSI, SVU, LBJ, CIA, NSA, LSD (LDS), AMA...

tv--As you might have guessed, I don't watch much television programming. I have so many movies and shows on DVD that I just create my own programming schedule as many people do. But with just an occasional-glance at the glass tit, I see plenty: tons-and-tons of gore, but allowable since it's some pig investigative show like CSI. For some reason, the public wants this shit, and I can tell all of you why.

The absence of real war footage from Iraq. During the Vietnam conflict, the public got pretty upset by the images of human beings on all sides of the war--no legs, no arms, body-parts everywhere, people screaming in agony, dead women and children everywhere, atrocities, guts spilling-out of trunk of a wounded G.I. (also screaming), and-on-and-on. Americans finally had to see what they were responsible for, what they allowed to happen. The war pigs learned their lessons (aka "learning the lessons of Vietnam"--don't let the public see the human toll).

But the public suspects the same thing is going on in Iraq today, and that it could be even worse with us torturing people, frequently to the point of death. That's messy, so the Pentagon and the media (on orders from the executive branch and the private sector) have made it impossible to cover the war in any logical or adequate sense. Instead, it's that fat, dead woman with her big fake tits, gaggles of missing white girls, O.J. fucking-up as usual, and tons of other pseudo-news that would have made a kiss-ass journo in the 1960s sick. Again, the public suspects the real picture is much worse.

This is why we have all these CSI-like shows with the autopsy scenes. The public has a psychological need to see these things, to know the reality, which is a good thing. Americans are willing to face the fallout of their rush to war after 9/11, and they want redemption. We all want to take responsibility for our actions and inactions. And so, that's it. You would never have seen such incredibly detailed depictions of the human body in extremis back when Jack Klugman had the show "Quincy," based on the famous L.A. coroner Thomas Noguchi. Of course, there are those eternal child sickos who actually get-off on viscera, but who cares what they think?

It was even unthinkable in the 1980s, with a gradual-shift during the 1990s after the broadcast of David Lynch's Twin Peaks. The X-Files also contributed to the shift, while Clinton continued Bush I's "no-fly zone" over Iraq. And then came his bombing of their infrastructure that caused the deaths of 500,000 children--an entire generation of Iraqi children were murdered. The public understands more than you might think, even if it's not on a conscious level. There it is.

Well duh: Sam Donaldson Not "IN" Phone Records of Jeane Palfrey's Pamela Martin & Associates

The Generally Crappy Mainstream Media/Washington D.C.--This is a good one-- Rob Capriccioso, "sometime" blogger for Radaronline.com and founder and proprietor of Bigheaddc.com has been let go from Radar for screwing-up and stating that Sam Donaldson's phone number is in the phone records of the so-called "DC Madam's" (Deborah Jeane Palfrey) former escort service, casting it in a light that Palfrey alleges never existed.

It's likely that Larry Flynt's investigator Dan Moldea has also chimed in that the number means nothing of any significance. Does anyone do thorough fact-checking anymore? Nah, that's not cost-effective. I think they're giving away Press Club credentials with a pack of Chicklets (TM) nowadays, right? Ask Larisa Alexadrovna, she might know. But right, he wasn't a REAL journalist, whatever that means these days.

Why would someone like Bigheaddc.com's Capriccioso do something like this? Who's telling the truth? In this case, my money is on Palfrey. Cook has called her story "bullshit," and probably because it didn't deliver the salacious material they wanted. Why not look at all the other aspects of the story, the political ones? Nope, it's the easy fix for Radaronline and Bigheaddc, the "hooker" story.

They're willfully ignoring what's important to the story, just like the rest of the media, and to their shame. It's possible that because the blogs are starved for resources, Rob Capriccioso and John Cook saw an opportunity to get some of those funds through a big scoop (more advertisers). Something went wrong--it wasn't the big story they thought it should or would be. An exchange between Radar's Editor, John Cook and Capriccioso has been going on since yesterday evening, here's some of it:

[Ed.-Posted by John Cook, November 13th, 2007...]

On Nov 12, 2007 11:34 AM, John Cook wrote:
Rob-

I need to talk to you about Donaldson. Can you call me or e-mail me a
number?

John

***

On 11/12/07 12:28 PM, "Rob Capriccioso" wrote:

John,

The update you posted containing much off the record information
between me and Tyler has nothing to do with new information Big Head
DC received and reported regarding Donaldson. I don't understand what
you are doing. Can you clarify ASAP via e-mail?

Rob
--
Rob Capriccioso | Publisher & Founding Editor | Big Head DC |
bigheadDC.com | rob@bigheadDC.com | AIM: bigheadrob007

***

On Nov 12, 2007 12:29 PM, John Cook wrote:

I called you and left a msg

You have my phone number. If you want to talk, call me. ...

[Ed.--Capriccioso responds with a correspondence from a reader who also happens to be a blogger...]


To how many different Radar writers did you expect me to give quotes, John:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: S. Huff
Date: Nov 12, 2007 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: About the Donaldson story...
To: Rob Capriccioso

Thank you, Rob. I appreciate it.

Steve...

On Nov 12, 2007 12:09 PM, Rob Capriccioso wrote:

Hey Steve,

Heading out of pocket right now -- have to run. But here are a couple
of quick quotes. ..."I'm extremely confident in our story. And - let me be clear - how ABC
has maneuvered its reporting of the 'DC Madam' case is the real story
here." ..."We're currently researching another high-profile national anchor, who
has been especially critical of political hypocrisy in the past."

Sincerely, Rob

Rob Capriccioso | Publisher & Founding Editor | Big Head DC |
bigheadDC.com | rob@bigheadDC.com | AIM: bigheadrob007

On Nov 12, 2007 11:50 AM, wrote:

Rob,

Don't know if you authored the post on Sam Donaldson possibly being in the
DC Madam's phone records , but it looks like you're the guy to contact in
general for BigheadDC. I wrote a short entry for Radar's "Fresh
Intelligence" last night linking the BigHeadDC post. They've posted it but
they've asked to me seek comment/confirmation on the story. I'm not going to
ask for source info or anything, of course, but a comment on the story --
how solidly do you stand by it, that sort of thing -- would be helpful. I can be reached at
678-778-2849 or call you -- I couldn't find a number quickly for you or I would have gone that route.

Thanks, Steve Huff

Rob Capriccioso | Publisher & Founding Editor | Big Head DC |
bigheadDC.com | rob@bigheadDC.com | AIM: bigheadrob007 ...

It comes-off as being like a flame war by a couple of teens in a chat room, doesn't it? Ownership of outlets is the key to our current problem with the media, and we should be subsidizing independent outlets so these outbursts are minimized.

The government should be funding independent outlets so people like Cook and Capriccioso spend their time productively for the good of our society, becoming a strengthening force for our democracy in a time when it's badly needed. The Founding Fathers thought this was an exceptional idea...you know, if you want a democracy at all. It seems some of us don't, especially the more money we have and make. Where are these "independent outlets, Matt," you might be asking?

You're on the most important one right now, the internet. Whoops! That would be logical in a democracy--giving money to people with opinions we don't like--but it doesn't serve the unbridled interests of unaccountable power, so down the memory hole it goes, bloop! Making that same silly mistake of actual independent thought again, I always assumed that in our legal system when one is accused of something that there's an exchange of information between the plaintiff (the accuser/prosecution) and the defendant. In a trial, this is called the "discovery process."

From today's missive from Ms. Palfrey and her attorney, Montgomery Blair Sibley:

One has to ask:

-Why has and is the Department of Justice going to such lengths to keep me from having access to materials I rightly am entitled?

-Why does Mr. Sibley have to seek assistance from the Court, to obtain this mandatory discovery?

-As importantly, why have the Government’s lawyers made numerous efforts to keep this very same information from coming to light via the use of injunctions and protective orders?

-What exactly is the Government hiding? [Ed.-I can hazard a guess...no case, and their own very real crimes under the umbrella of officialdom.]

('Government AUSA's Refuse to Disclose Mandatory Discovery in D.C. Madam Case...,' 11.13.2007)

Where's the discovery process? This--to belabor the point again-and-again--is what we all assume occurs at the federal level, just like in state and local trial courts. We would be wrong, particularly in drug and/or forfeiture cases...or the case of Ms. Palfrey. Today, Jeane has filed a motion once again (is Judge Kessler napping a lot these days?) to obtain information, since assistant U.S. Attorney William Rakestraw [Ed.--Perhaps we know what some of his ancestors did...] Cowden won't even respond to any of these motions for discovery.

Of course, Cowden's doing so under the orders of his superiors, U.S. Attorneys Kathleen Connolly and Jeffrey A. Taylor. Taylor is currently the man helping the White House obstruct subpoenas on Karl Rove and Harriet Miers from the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. This writer believes Mrs. Connolly and her hubbie have visited this site numerous times. Hello. You know this already Mrs. Connolly: You and Mr. Taylor don't represent the interests of the average American. Please resign before it's too late.

If Miers or Karl Rove are dragged into court, it's likely that Mr. Taylor--as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia--will begin the real obstructions he was appointed to expedite, hence the reason for his extraordinary appointment under the Patriot Act provision. This is the man prosecuting Deborah Jeane Palfrey, a man very close to the U.S. Attorney firing scandal, and a man who never would have been appointed at all had it not been for said scandal. Surely, Judge Kessler has noted this as a very real possibility, and that the case against Palfrey is decidedly political.

To deny such is to deny what everyone can see as plain as the nose on their own face every morning. Her rulings and statements in several areas are not only disingenuous, but are a denial of objective reality. Bluntly-put, she is lying in her rulings in these areas, particularly in her bold assertion that there's no political element to the prosecution of Palfrey.

Judge Kessler shows all the poker-faced impassivity of a Mandarin, which is appropriate in some ways. But is she missing something in her attempts at impartiality, or hiding behind the image of acting impartial? Will justice prevail, and will there at least be reasonable due process? We're still waiting. As Mr. Taylor was appointed as an interim U.S. Attorney by the former, disgraced Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (in that hidden provision of the Patriot Act renewal in 2006, now repealed), and it could be a very long wait. Whether the new attorney general will be significantly different is an unknown. What will Michael Mukasey be any different than Gonzales? This writer thinks it's doubtful, but there's always hope!

Nonetheless, all the media can--or is allowed to--talk and write about is this absurd, pseudo-titillating blurb of a blogger who thought he had a "big fish." He should go track-down Ronald Roughead--but then, so should the rest of the discredited mainstream press. If Huffington Post wants to rescue its sagging credibility, it would behoove them to look into the less salacious (sexy) aspects of Ms. Palfrey's legal predicament.

Perhaps Judge Kessler and all these other clowns just want to help preserve a rickety, corrupt, and ailing order that doesn't deserve saving (for the sake of their own petty privileges). That would be a lousy epitaph for anybody, including John Cook, Rob Capriccioso, and even Sam Donaldson. "Bullshit" indeed. (Revised 11.14.2007)

Common Dreams, 01.27.2007: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0127-01.htm

February 14th background on 14 US Attorneys serving without Senate approval: http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/story/2007/2/14/9546/72609

Jeffrey A. Taylor's DOJ page: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/dc/US_Attorney/index.html

'Secret Rooms' and the Ongoing Surveillance of the American Public

"We know that information we have been able to acquire about foreign threats will help us detect and prevent attacks on our homeland. Mike McConnell, the Director of National Intelligence, has assured me that this bill gives him the most immediate tools he needs to defeat the intentions of our enemies. And so in signing this legislation today I am heartened to know that his critical work will be strengthened and we will be better armed to prevent attacks in the future."
--President George W. Bush, 08.05.2007.

USSA--I have a source--we'll call them 'Z'--who has seen one of these secret communications rooms that we're now hearing about. Specifically, there's a story that has been making the rounds this last week over the assertions of Mark Klein, a retired AT&T communications technician. Like my source, he's seen one of these rooms, and he even claims to have worked in one them, transferring literally every single call, internet transmission--everything that goes out on AT&T's station through a conduit in San Francisco. Klein's story and assertions are credible, according to my source, and these programs stretch-back into his experiences working at a switching station:

The central witness in a California lawsuit against AT&T says the government is vacuuming up billions of e-mails and phone calls as they pass through an AT&T switching station in San Francisco. Mark Klein, a retired AT&T technician, helped connect a device in 2003 that he says diverted and copied onto a government supercomputer every call, e-mail, and Internet site access on AT&T lines. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the class-action suit, claims there are as many as 20 such sites in the U.S. The White House has promised to veto any bill that does not grant immunity from suits such as this one. (AP, 11.12.2007)

The veto threat is an acknowledgment by the Bush administration that they have violated the Constitution of the United States of America (the source of all our law), as well as the FISA of 1978. Predictably, their allies in Congress want to make a retroactive immunity for the White House and all the companies like AT&T who allowed them free reign over such switching stations. But back to 'Z'...

The reality of all of this is that these programs have a genesis that goes back into the 1960s, back when it was 'Ma Bell,' instead of the new monopoly called AT& T. 'Z' worked in a switching station, and didn't have a security clearance, but the door to the secret room was frequently open. Imagine the irresponsibility behind this, and consider that this particular anecdote happened during 1986. Yes, these programs having been going-on for at least 21-years minimum, even predating widespread access to the internet.

'Z' also tells me that they were able to view sensitive NSA, FBI, and CIA teletypes as they were printing-out, and had ample time to copy and/or photograph the information. 'Z' did not, but it was immediately obvious that the room itself was not secure. Today's comments by Donald Kerr, the main deputy director of national intelligence should be viewed with not only suspicion, but contempt by all Americans who value their liberties. When the government--with a specific agenda--starts tracking the political opinions of private citizens, we're all in jeopardy. Even those expediting these violations of the Fourth amendment for their bosses in the White House are in danger.

Kerr's reasoning that it's OK to spy on Americans is that many young people post extremely personal information on the internet, therefore, surveillance of everyone is valid. Right, kids don't do stupid things, not ever. His examples are poor ones, and he consciously avoids the fact that these individuals willingly post the information about themselves, while the programs he's advocating are not voluntary in any respect. Kerr's attempts at arguing for these programs with an expansion of FISA spying powers is beyond wrong-headed--it's cowardly and un-American. It's just more circular reasoning meant to sway the public towards giving-up even more of their rights by scaring them, when the polls reflect a genuine concern over losing them. They're trying to mould opinion.

This is what the functionaries and the intelligentsia believe: what the public wants, needs, and thinks should be the country's direction doesn't matter, we do the thinking. The anti-democratic sentiment of this should be obvious. Congress majorally holds the same convictions. There's a gulf between what they say and what they do. Leading-the-charge is the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and they had some interesting points to make in an article by their civil liberties director, Jennifer Granick back in late-October:

The New York Times revealed the existence of this warrantless surveillance program in December 2005. After this revelation, the Bush Administration admitted it was listening without warrants to known al-Qaida members who called, or were called by, people in the United States. However, the warrantless wiretapping went much further than that. A former AT&T engineer by the name of Mark Klein revealed that all internet traffic flowing through AT&T's backbone was regularly diverted to the NSA. (Wired, 10.22.2007)

This corresponds exactly with 'Z's' assertions that the same thing was occurring at the Midwestern switching station he worked at in 1986-88. These agencies don't even have to be in the rooms physically, and this was the case to some extent back in the late-1980s. The activities encompassed more than just the teletypes, and as previously mentioned in this piece, the room was not secure. Anyone could have walked into it at various times when it was unattended, which was frequent, not periodic. At one point, there was an actual breach found of the room. What happened after that is beyond 'Z's' knowledge.

My source states that anyone could have gotten on the janitorial staff of the switching station (or any low-level job in the building at some point) and obtained direct access to the secret room with just a very small amount of persistence and an average intelligence. It's a small wonder that the attacks of September 11th, 2001 were possible when such situations exist, and it should be obvious to all that the people working to gain these wider surveillance powers are the same kinds of people who allowed these aforementioned breaches to exist in the first place. 'Z' states that 'it wasn't a situation isolated to the switching station I worked in, which I was told of from [communications] technicians.' This is what the White House has to say about the recently passed 'Protect America Act':

Our Work Is Not Done — This Act Is A Temporary, Narrowly Focused Statute To Deal With The Most Immediate Needs Of The Intelligence Community To Protect The Country. [Ed.-original emphasis.] When Congress returns in September, the Intelligence Committees and leaders in both parties will need to complete work on the comprehensive reforms requested by Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell, including the important issues of providing meaningful liability protection to those who are alleged to have assisted our Nation following the attacks of September 11, 2001. (Whitehouse.gov, 08.06.2007)

The wording is pretty Orwellian--give-up your rights so we can protect them. Use of the term 'meaningful liability protection' betrays a knowledge that the surveillance methods used secretly after 9/11 were illegal at the time of their commission--and collusion--by the government and the telecom giants. The truth is that it has been occurring for decades across both Democratic and Republican administrations and majorities in Congress. Only Qwest refused to grant access to their communications stations without a warrant. It should be noted here that many of the same politicians who are going to vote on whether to expand such powers in the future--or not--are receiving major contributions from a number of telecommunication corporations who are currently living in fear of losing against a mass of pending lawsuits.

In a contravention of American legal tradition whose original authorship can only have begun within the White House and the ranks of the GOP, many members of Congress want to give them retroactive immunity. Having friends helps. Only the American public can put-the-brakes to such idiocy, a stampede of desperation to save the privileges and power of a dying order. That's why the game we're seeing is being played-out at all. Only Congress, the mainstream media, the White House, and the Supreme Court seemed 'confused' over the constitutional issues, the public has historically known best on such matters.

Precisely sixteen Democratic members of the Senate voted for the PAA--it's time they started explaining themselves more fully. They are: Evan Bayh (Ind.), Ken Salazar (Col.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), Claire McCaskill (Mo.), Mary Landrieu (Lo.), Amy Kolbuchar (Minn.), Dianne Feinstein (Ca.), Dan Inouye (Haw.), Tom Carper (Del.), Kent Conrad (ND), Robert P. Casey (Pa.), Jim Webb (Va.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Ben Nelson (Neb.), Bill Nelson (Fla.), and Barbara Mikulski (Md.). Sens. John Kerry, John McCain, Barbara Boxer, the recovering Tim Johnson from South Dakota, and Dick Lugar (R-In.) all declined to vote, and to their eternal shame. Feel free to contact all of them and to continue reminding them you're watching, and will be voting accordingly in the next elections. Better yet, start raising-up some new candidates while you're at it. All of these incumbents have to go unless they're willing to change and to act as if they're actually Americans, rather than some Soviet sect. 'Z' expresses a warning in our conversations: 'This has been going-on for a long-time, people just don't know about it.'

AP today: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071112/ap_on_go_ot/terrorist_surveillance

'What's at Stake in the Surveillance Debate in Congress': http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/commentary/circuitcourt/2007/10/circuitcourt_1023

The Senate Roll Call vote on S.1927 (The Protect America Act), August 3rd, 2007:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00309#name

Former (Which has a Good Ring to it) President George H.W. Bush: 'Leave My Sonny Alone'

Washington D.C.--Shut up little man. Do not talk.

DNA TEST CONFIRMS...CONFIRMS?! GIPPER HAD NO CHILDREN

Notre Dame, Indiana--Who cares? Someone who was afraid the trademark was in jeopardy. The once great football team is no more, maybe next year. Alright, I don't really care, but there it is. He didn't have a kid. He also died before he could graduate. Ronald Reagan did a bad job playing him, and I don't even know what he was like. But that's because Reagan couldn't have played himself well, and didn't when he sneaked into the White House thanks to voter apathy. Thanks Roger Aisles, thanks Bohemian Grove. Notre Dame had him speak at a commencement during the 80s. Why didn't they just costume him up as the Devil and kiss his ass? Thanks for having Ronnie here, attempting human speech at Notre Dame, and fuck you for embarrassing me. Mr. Wall, tear down this Gorbachev. If only I could have visited the Reagan Library and gotten an ashtray or a jellybean--they say the security there's lax folks, so go get a piece of what you paid-for (and still are).

My stepmother accidentally bumped right into him once in an area that the Secret Service had cordoned-off...but neglected to get her out of. He wasn't worth shooting anyway, and Hinckley made very poor--American made--dum-dum slugs. Besides, all it would have accomplished was to make George H.W. Bush president earlier--but we won't dwell on that. Also, I need to say a very special 'fuck you' to Bethel College, who had George W. Bush speak here in 2004 to prop-up local Rep. Chris Chocola--he lost, even after the GOP stole the elections again. We didn't need either of them--Reagan or George W. Bush--coming here to remind me I'm surrounded by wrong-headed assholes, rednecks, and morons. Chris Chocola: how's the private sector working-out? Good-riddance to you, asshole.

Robert Blakey who mishandled the House Assassinations Committee during the late-1970s teaches law at Notre Dame, rah-rah. That was good-thinking: appoint a Republican attorney to oversee the investigations into the assassinations of a Democratic President (JFK), his brother (RFK), & Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. . Great idea, then reward him with a post running N.D. 's (Napalm Death) law department...wait, that kinda sucks. Why not Harvard? He must not be an Alan Dershowitz, but neither is the real guy either. I'm part-Irish on my mother's mother's side (make sense?), was baptized Catholic, and I still think Notre Dame's campus resembles a metastasizing tumor that fell off of the Vatican's undying-ass. The Gipper died young. When Notre Dame's acolytes aren't phoning-in death-threats to muckraking writers coming to do book-signings in Michiana, or threatening property-owners likewise, they're making money hand-over-fist. South Bend gets the crumbs. With such a shitty team, there's going to be fewer-crumbs, especially for the scalpers.

In the 1980s, Notre Dame was a quaint little campus with some interesting history. I loved walking through the campus during the Summer at night, it was so peaceful. You couldn't do that today, that time is gone forever. Now, it just appears to be a big pile of bullshit where mafia kids and the zombie-rich's progeny can go to have too much homework, cry from the stress, and die of alcohol-poisoning (and call locals Blacks 'nigger,' resulting in their being shot in the face). That'll learn ya.' Maybe not. Yes, it was always a place that welcomed hypocrisy, but it's transcended that now. Thanks for fucking-up my country, Ronald Reagan--and all the dumb assholes who think you anything but a shill, a washed-up pseudo-actor and athlete, and a whore from Illinois with no brains. You should have stayed a lifeguard, you were qualified to be that, and only that. And 'Rudy' sucked, I could tell you stories about the real guy that aren't flattering. Notre Dame is America, and it looks flabby and corrupt.

G-H-B, T-O-Y

China/USSA--Fuck me, man, where can I score me some of those toys? Don't tell Nick Nolte, and keep the kids away from those pesky pedophiles...you know, priests and GOP congressmen. Suck it, you'll like it. By God, if there's a profit, all those damned politicians will be screaming to keep the flow of these poisonous, defective toys coming into this once great nation. JUST SAY NO! Well, maybe just once, we can suck on these plastic pieces here. They took a toke, and all their cares, went up in smoke. It's not just for kids anymore.

Have You Seen This Cookie Dough Eating Woman? Editor Ponders Whether He's Gotten a Visit from 'Dr.' Paula Neble

SITE METER--A curious gaggle of visitors have been clustering to this site from almost the very moment of its coverage about the legal predicament of Deborah Jeane Palfrey. So far, it's been a truly stunning-array.

It could be presumed that many of these visitors are professionals, individuals in officialdom, corporate executives and functionaries, members of think-tanks, former presidential advisers (and/or their agents), agents of the federal government, private military and intelligence contractors (SAIC & MITRE have visited--the 'mitre' being the fish-shaped hat the Nazi Pope wears, originally coming from the Cult of Dagon), our generally poor mainstream media, some officeholders, possible intelligence offices of several nations, NATO's offices, numerous federal departments and administrations, Congress, the Navy (one of the most frequent of 'official' guests), the United States Army--even the unholy five-sided Pentagon itself has been here, that archetype of evil and death.

Washington D.C. isn't just 'Hollywood for ugly people,' it's that strangest-of-places where there are so many professional conventions, minus the normal conventionalism of the little people. It's academic to say that many of these site hits are individuals in the phone records of Pamela Martin & Associates. It's certain.

But even early-on, there were some visitors who just kept coming back, popping-up on the site meter periodically, and that was especially curious to this writer. The National Institutes of Health is one, while one from Severna, Maryland just returns over-and-over. The one with Warl.org is plainly peculiar. While Palfrey's client-base extends into Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and even New York City, there have been a number of hits to this site from Maryland that just keep returning, and they too revisit over-and-over again.

NIH seemed out-of-place at first, but then, you have to realize that some of Ms. Palfrey's escorts were extremely professional individuals, and so were the clients--especially so in some cases. Those professional clients and small businessmen aren't the ones the public wants and needs to know about--we need to know what officials in (and out) of the phone records and contractors of the government are doing on our dollar and in our name. Are any of these site hits 'Dr.' Paula Neble? Yes, I'm being sarcastic, but I'm saying she has visited here. We know her handlers have.

Paula Neble has claimed to many people that she was a doctor--she isn't a real doctor (doctor of lunacy perhaps), or even a college graduate, and it's likely that the government has probably helped her to go 'underground' (a hint to journalists: stakeout her mother's house if you haven't been already).

Neble is that strange case: she isn't really the kind of woman Palfrey appears to have hired normally, so perhaps she tried to have all the appearance of being like the others. Why? Surely, it could have just been a ploy to get hired, and Neble may have been extremely out of her depth. It would explain a lot.

Being the same age as many of her government handlers at Justice, she's probably felt a kind of camaraderie with some of them, since they also appear to be overextended themselves. Or maybe it's just a case of the Stockholm syndrome on her part. Who ever said playtime ended after childhood? Life is like the movies. Would they all be more well-behaved in a better world? Nah. Playtime's over, and Hollywood's on-strike. This is about affecting a real defendant's life with real world consequences for all involved. Justice isn't being served, and that's serious. This writer believes Judge Kessler suspects this as well.

Remember the late Dr. Brandy Britton, a doctor of Sociology? Dead. That's serious, and so is 55 years in prison. That's one's natural life. Equally serious is the threat posed by a case like this to due process. If the government has had such a great case all-along with such heavy, punitive charges against the defendant, why then do they keep claiming secrecy rules because there's 'an ongoing investigation' that could be compromised? That's a lame excuse, it's as flaccid as a politician's penis.

Palfrey named Neble in a civil suit for a breach of contract back in the Spring of this year (for engaging in prostitution against her express wishes), and Neble has been that one lone name we all learned early-on in this story. She's the first of the government's witnesses/informants to be made public. We probably wouldn't even know her name had the defendant not filed the civil suit against her. Where is she hiding, and why is she being afforded the kind of anonymity that the defendant hasn't?

At this point, it should be obvious that the prosecution knows full-well that Palfrey has a good idea of the names of her accusers and some of their backgrounds...but the public doesn't, and the prosecution wants to prevent this for some reason. Conversely, they have selectively released edited evidence to specific media outlets such as the Smoking Gun.

We--the public--know virtually nothing about Paula Neble...and neither does her mother. What she appears to be is a pathological liar being harbored and used as a 'cooperating witness' against Deborah Jeane Palfrey in a government case gone very wrong. We just don't know much of anything except that she had Senator David Vitter and Harlan Ullman as clients and a few anecdotes. Paula's poor mother must be appalled.

Until May, she had no idea what her daughter was up to, and it seems very few others did either. This is troubling in a criminal case with an impending trial set for February 19th, but Judge Kessler could open the doors to a real discovery process after the end of this month. But it should be remembered that Palfrey has filed the suit against as many as 15 other 'Jane Does,' probably being her last crew of escorts.

Research by the New York Daily News (by journalist James Meek back in early-May) and WTOP has uncovered the fact that Neble never earned a doctorate, or any degree at all. According to Meek's questioning of her mother, she only took a few biology classes at the college level. Why would she go around claiming she had a doctorate when she didn't? Again, she was presenting a picture of a different person to Palfrey and others, and the reasons could be very banal. But, amazingly, that's it--we know nothing more about her, and she changed her name in 2001.

She really seems like a mixed-up hustler who got into something much bigger than she could handle. This has some interesting echoes with the Naval Academy 'supply officer' who is--astonishingly enough--still employed at Annapolis! It might be assumed that she must have served some overarching purpose, and that they know some pretty compromising information on (self-) 'important' people. People like Harlan Ullman and Vitter. This writer's money is on a connection to the Cunningham scandal, and Palfrey has dropped the name in the past. The involvement of SAIC-employee tends towards this thesis as well.

Neble didn't have much of an education when she worked for Pamela Martin & Associates, so it's strange that anyone would have believed that a cookie-dough eating, sleazy romance novel reading Texan could be anything other than what she really was: a pathological liar and a loser with little-or-no grasp of the truth. Did she have some gift for the gab? How did she pull-it-off? At least that's what acquaintances of Neble have been saying. This site enjoins anyone with direct information about Ms. Neble to come forward with it, we're all interested to know what kind of individuals the government uses as witnesses/informants under the Bush administration's (or any other) Justice Department. Neble's old apartment was catty corner to the Pentagon, and like many of the current administration's ranks and supporters, she's from Houston, Texas.

The government had better hope she's not their star witness. She's out there, somewhere, eating cookie-dough on the taxpayer's dime, lying to her government babysitters who likely tired of her boorishness long-ago. Funny, she sounds like my ex. My guess is the feds are keeping Ms. Plump in a safe house--not from criminal danger of any kind, but from public scrutiny since she's already displayed all the traits of a bad witness for any case. Where? Probably within the Washington D.C. area, and that she and her handlers have been poring-over the internet since they have a lot of time on their hands. They should, they might be in a lot of trouble. You can probably bank on that one too.

And it would also be interesting to know specifically if Ms. Neble ever had any contact (physical) with Ret. Colonel Ronald Roughead of SAIC, and Brent Wilkes. SAIC could be linked to the Cunningham scandal by-way of 'Hookergate.' We could be finding-out a whole lot more of the narrative after the TRO (temporary restraining order) hearing on November 28th, the other turkey day with the accusers playing the bird. Here's to a good carving-up.

With luck, federal District Judge Gladys Kessler will allow Palfrey's civil suit to go forward, and the accuser will finally be forced out into the sunlight. Neble won't be the only name released after a lifting of the restraining order on Palfrey's suit against Neble, we'll know more about her accusers and why the government prosecution didn't want us to. What a Strange Brew. (Revised, 11.08.2007)

Domain Name		nih.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address		128.231.88.# (National Institutes of Health)
ISP		National Institutes of Health
Location		Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : Maryland City : Bethesda Lat/Long : 38.9878, -77.1262 (Map)
Language		English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System		Microsoft WinXP
Browser		Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Javascript		version 1.3
Monitor		Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit		Nov 7 2007 5:41:14 am
Last Page View		Nov 7 2007 5:41:56 am
Visit Length		42 seconds
Page Views		2
Referring URL		http://www.google.co...la neble&btnG=Search
Search Engine		google.com
Search Words		subpoena paula neble
Visit Entry Page		http://chickasawpick...esmell.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page		http://chickasawpick...oenaing-senator.html
Out Click
Time Zone		UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time		Nov 6 2007 5:41:14 pm
Visit Number		23,060