Monday, June 23, 2008

Why did Tim Russert have a heart attack?


Our Generally Crappy Mainstream Media--It's funny, in Scott McClellan's "What Happened," he talks about how the Bush administration didn't--and we can assume still doesn't--trust the mainstream press. Well, neither does the public, Scotty. That's odd, but Scott writes a lot of contradictory things like that. Do I think he's lying? No, but he's obviously confused about what happened to him during his unfortunate association with George W. Bush and Co. (1999-2006). That's understandishable,and something to bloviate over.

Of all of the single news shows out there, Dick Cheney went to speak on Tim Russert's more than any other. He's mentioned three times in the index of "What Happened," while Michael Moore not only isn't listed, he doesn't get even a passing mention in the entire book. In fact, in the section where Bush first heard that the attacks of September 11th, 2001, we get no mention of "My Pet Goat," though McClellan does state that the president appeared stunned and in a trance. Fine. But this is a little puzzling, and if one looks to McClellan's past behavior, it's congruent with when he was press secretary and deputy press secretary: he's protecting George W. Bush.

So did Tim Russert, and the majority of the mass media we jokingly refer to as the "Fourth Estate," which we can assume means that it's always for sale to the highest bidder. Fortunately, the public is buying this property less-and-less. But Scott-Scott-Scott...he was sick on that Italian vacation, a place that's re-experiencing those heady-days when Il Duce was once popular and vendors could sell little images of him openly in the streets. It's Berlusconi time again, and they've found the Lupercale.

Tim apparently felt "sick," and we're now hearing that he had to put his father in an assisted living facility. I can empathize to an extent. However, unlike millions of Americans, he had the money to cover it--and handily--so we can discount this as a factor in his heart attack. If it was, he was a noodle, not a man, but that appears to be a foregone conclusion anyway. No, it was because he was fat, slovenly, and because the Plame investigation was being reopened. Russert had direct-involvement in the story (something I can relate to!), and had to be coerced by the courts to testify his crucial part of the story in the leaking of the identity of an active CIA officer by government officials within the White House.

This crime was committed to discredit government inspector Joe Wilson's contention that the story that Iraq was attempting to procure uranium-ore ("yellowcake") in Niger was patently false. This was in the immediate aftermath of the illegal invasion of Iraq, and threatened the very rationale for the war: WMDs. As we know, over 1,000 nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles were found within the territory of Iraq shortly after our indefatigable troops watched the looting of the national treasures, along with tens-of-thousands of chemical and biological warheads.

Ironically, Wilson also happened to have been sent by the vice president's office to learn if the story was true, and also happened to be the husband of the "outed" CIA officer, but that wasn't a coincidence. That was the crime after the crime, after several-hundred other related crimes. The vice president's office was running the "discredit Joe Wilson" show, and Cheney's chief of staff (not his janitor) I. "Scooter" Libby was involved in the leaks. What's was Bush's nickname for Russert? McClellan's? He won't say, so it must be scatological...

To-the-point: it seems possible that fear of prosecution--at-minimum, a subpoenaing again--and the obvious threat to his career with the reopening of the Plame investigation by the House Judiciary Committee contributed to the death of Tim Russert. The story of his father doesn't wash. The average American would endure more stress over the medical costs than someone as well-heeled as Russert.

He was hardly suffering financially if he was vacationing with his family in Italy. Certainly, the heat of the Mediterranean could have contributed to his heart condition, and of course, too much eating. Autopsy, anyone? Why not? The press seems hard-pressed to bury the man, so what gives? Of all the allies of this administration outside of the GOP, the mainstream press has the most accommodating and loyal. They still are. Here rests the reasons for the never-ending tributes, and the spirit of sincere journalism--six feet under.


On George Carlin's Death


"Who is more to be pitied, a writer bound and gagged by policemen or one living in perfect freedom who has nothing more to say?"
--Kurt Vonnegut

J-7--He was a generally funny man who got too cynical with age and the passing times. While this isn't hard considering how bad things are, and are likely to get soon, it was the wrong message. Even in the worst-of-times, there are incredible historical opportunities to change things, and George Carlin refused to accept this.

Nonetheless, his pointed-barbs at himself and all of us were a real treat in a human society that places no value on the truth. If George Carlin was about anything, it was the truth as he saw it, and said it he did. Like the rest of us, he was a wounded idealist, and not really a true cynic.

From his own first brush with the law defending Lenny Bruce from arrest in the early-1960s, Carlin did what he could to push the boundaries of the language and what's permissible. Just as Lenny had before him, he was obsessed with the
quiet, daily hypocrisies that go without comment. That's what was so great about George Carlin and Richard Pryor, two ardent disciples of Lenny. It's unlikely that anyone's going to replace them anytime soon. The truth gene is recessive.

I witnessed a huge-swath of George Carlin's career, but one television performance from the late-1970s stands-out: Carlin simply walked onto the stage and said nothing, but would react with his body language when the audience began laughing nervously, just staring wide-eyed at them. By the end of eight minutes, he had everyone completely in-stitches. It was pure genius, and a testament to an artist's ability to remain subversive, even when stripped of their usual language.

But he was a crazy fucker who got too cynical, and maybe watching him fade was akin to how the public felt about Mark Twain in his last years. He was great, that George Carlin, one funny nose-picking motherfucker. Maybe he was right in his cynicism? Maybe. Maybe not. Will the truth set you free? Besides emotionally, it can't hurt, and only help.

It's better to know when a runaway train is headed your way, than not to.
When George Carlin was at his best, he could make us laugh about the impending doom, and laugh-it-off. The laughs are over, and it's time to confront those problems. Sleep well.

The High-Price of Oil: Who's to Blame?


Washington D.C.--You're actually asking this goddamned stupid question, CNN? Are you fucking idiots? No, don't answer, we already know that you are. We're all to blame for the high-price of oil because America uses too much. We drive too much, our wasteful business community and related industries use far too much, our military uses far too much, and we just don't want to learn.

So, instead of actually doing something marginally proactive about it, Congress had more hearings today. C-Span has been covering it most of the day, as well as the major news outlets that we all love. Great. Nothing changed. The logical thing for the representatives in Congress (for now) to do is to question themselves, an added masturbatory-tone to their usual back-and-forth. Now spit.

Sunday, June 22, 2008

More Larfs from the Mailbox: A chain-letter (filled-out example)


The J-7 Mailbox
--A dear friend sent this and filled-it-out. His answers are absurd and hilarious to me, though I can't say why. Probably because they're so irrational.




DIRECTIONS: Now, Here Is What You Are Supposed To Do...And Please Do Not Spoil The Fun!

Hit Forward, Delete My Answers And Type In Your Answers. Then Send This To A Whole Bunch Of People That You Know...And Send It Back To Me So I Can See Your Answers,

The Theory Is That You Will Learn A Lot Of Little Known Facts About Those You Know. Remember To Send It Back Please!

1. WERE YOU NAMED AFTER ANYONE? yes
2. WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU CRIED? now
3. DO YOU LIKE YOUR HANDWRITING? Didn't tag all of those railroad cars for nothing
4. WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE LUNCH MEAT? olive loaf
5. DO YOU HAVE KIDS? Talk to my lawyer

6. IF YOU WERE ANOTHER PERSON, WOULD YOU BE FRIENDS WITH YOU? no, just another subject


7. DO YOU USE SARCASM ALOT? What is sarcasm?
8. DO YOU STILL HAVE YOUR TONSILS yes
9. WOULD YOU BUNGEE JUMP? I don't even need a bungee
10. WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE CEREAL? murder
11. DO YOU UNTIE YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU TAKE THEM OFF? no, only when I can't get them on.
12. DO YOU THINK YOU ARE STRONG? enough

13. WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE ICE CREAM ? soy (lactose intolerant)
14. WHAT IS THE FIRST THING YOU NOTICE ABOUT PEOPLE? Any kind of horrific disfigurement
15. RED OR PINK? PINK!!! (red is likely to be infected)

16. WHAT IS THE LEAST FAVORITE THING ABOUT YOURSELF? too humble
17. WHO DO YOU MISS THE MOST? the small, fast people. the big, slow ones are easy targets
18. DO YOU WANT EVERYONE TO SEND THIS BACK TO YOU? Cash will suffice
19. WHAT COLOR PANTS AND SHOES ARE YOU WEARING? Pervert
20. WHAT WAS THE LAST THING YOU ATE ? Not finished yet
21. WHAT ARE YOU LISTENING TO RIGHT NOW? voices in my head, but I don't necessarily agree with them.
22. IF YOU WERE A CRAYON, WHAT COLOR WOULD YOU BE?
Burnt Joe Duke
23. FAVORITE SMELLS? cocaine
24. WHO WAS THE LAST PERSON YOU TALKED TO ON THE PHONE? Barney
25. DO YOU LIKE THE PERSON WHO SENT THIS TO YOU ? What a dick.
26. FAVORITE SPORTS TO WATCH? porn
27. HAIR COLOR? No thanks, I'm trying to quit
28. EYE COLOR? brown and red
29. DO YOU WEAR CONTACTS? What's that supposed to mean?
30. FAVORITE FOOD ? anything endangered

31. SCARY MOVIES OR HAPPY ENDINGS? Aren't they the same?
32. LAST MOVIE YOU WATCH? Big Tit Sluts
33. WHAT COLOR SHIRT ARE YOU WEARING? black
34. SUMMER OR WINTER? summer
35. HUGS OR KISSES? You're not my type
36. FAVORITE DESSERT?Corned beef
37. MOST LIKELY TO RESPOND? nobody
38. LEAST LIKELY TO RESPOND? tie between Napolean and Ghandi
39. WHAT BOOK ARE YOU READING NOW? I'm on the internet now
40. WHAT IS ON UR MOUSE PAD? Nothing a little soap and water won't take care of

41. WHAT DID YOU WATCH ON TV LAST NIGHT? Exciting breaking news coverage of Tim Russert's passing
42. FAVORITE SOUND? "c'mere"
43. ROLLING STONES OR BEATLES?Both with a side of Ween and some of those fried cinnamon things for dessert


44. How FAR HAVE YOU BEEN AWAY FROM HOME ? I can't imagine being any farther away from "home" than I am right now
45. WHOSE ANSWERS ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO GETTING BACK? Mine! (the suspense is killing me)

Saturday, June 21, 2008

FAITH AND PROPER CONDUCT(IVITY), by Jack Sterling

The great and wise scribe, Anonymous, an equally legendary contemporary to the philosopher Ubiquitous, once said that the argument between science and religion was solved when churches began to install lightning rods. That seems at first glance anyway to be a quick and easily recognizable signpost on theology’s passage into the contemporary era. Unfortunately, it wasn’t quite so effortless as it sounds or should have been. You might even say the idea didn’t catch fire immediately.

Let us quote from an article, Morality, Religious Symbolism, and the Creationist Movement, by Joseph E. Laferriere found on the National Center For Science Education website:

In 1752, ....., during the heyday of the New England "fire and brimstone" epoch, a Bostonian deist named Franklin invented the lightning rod and was promptly denounced from pulpits on both sides of the Atlantic for challenging the power of the devil. Since his contemporaries believed that Satan cannot do anything without the acquiescence of the Almighty, this implied to them that Franklin was thwarting the will of God. Franklin had thus challenged both the people's conceptions of their deity and the folk science which supported it. For twenty to thirty years, churches in both Europe and America refused to allow lightning rods to be affixed to their steeples, with some tragic results.

So it took about three decades and possibly some roasted parishioners to convince the Wiser Ones, Elders, Clerics, and the Ones In Touch With the Great Beyond [Ed.-AKA, "the Red Bat Phone to JHVH."] that there are some things in Heaven and Earth that men are meant to understand, or at least take a stab at figuring out. High on the list would be lightning, later to be known as our helpful friend, ELECTRICITY.

Some people might remember Reddy Kilowatt, the little guy with the light-bulb head and lightning body that was the electrical company’s mascot and intended to engender the notion that electricity was our faithful though costly companion and servant. That’s why they call it a utility, it’s there to utilize, one might assume, at least now in these enlightened and superstition- free times.

Needless to say, it became a part of the tacit understanding of the deal between God and Man that natural law was to be understood, and to help all creatures above and below--one would think. Implicit to that, wouldn’t you also think that some of God’s Servants might get an exemption from natural law? Like a televangelist--say Pat Robertson--who’s now about as old as Benjamin Franklin, but is possibly planning to maintain something akin to immortality through that youth tonic he markets [Ed.The blood of infants?]? And what about the Pope? [Ed.--Definitely the blood of infants.] Surely the Pope--if anyone would--ought to be exempt from certain otherwise tragic Acts of God? Wouldn’t you think?

Think again: segue forward about two hundred and thirty-five years after Ben Franklin's day. It's September 12, 1987, the place is Miami, Florida, and the Pope is in town. It's a big deal in this Catholic-heavy part of the world. The first and only time thousands of the faithful will get to see the magnetic essence that inhabits the body of the previous, elderly Polish mortal who has taken on the mantle and spiritual essence, now renamed Pope John Paul II, the globe trotting beloved Holy Father of the Roman Catholic Church. In true Florida fashion, the day starts out to be sunny and bright, with only a few clouds on the horizon. Unfortunately the day will progress in true South Florida fashion for this time of year...

A large vacant field has been selected near Florida International University and a high podium has been raised to make the Pope and the honored priests and retainers visible to the thousands who show up for this great day. And an even higher steel cross, a hundred feet high specifically, has been erected above the podium.

As the time for the Pope’s appearance nears, the weather conditions progress. Storm conditions threaten, but the show must go on. At least it starts to. However, as the opening acts appear and contribute to the build up, rain begins to fall. The Pope begins to speak and to bless the crowd. Then comes thunder, effective in it’s way, like God is giving a fanfare with a drum roll. And lightning comes, which could possibly have been a rim shot, had there been a joke involved...maybe. But nobody in the audience is laughing now. People are looking up at the highly- conductive steel cross with what could charitably be called reverence. But you know, fear and reverence do have a certain connection, just check your Bible. God did say He expected some fear there. And God's beginning to get a measure of it, increasing rapidly.

It's decided that the conclusion of the festivities would be attended by the Pope and designated clerical invitees in a place with a roof over it, and though one might suppose it wouldn't be reported in the press, they equipped it with a lightning-rod.

So this has brought to mind a question that one who remembers the event has wrestled with for over twenty years: Is anyone safe, due to a special dispensation for goodness and righteousness? Doesn’t anyone get a pass...ever? I suppose you might say the lightning-rod was for the sake of the others on the podium who might not be quite as deserving of Divine Intervention. And I know that St. Francis said that "the rain falls on the just and the unjust alike."But rain is merely getting wet. It’s uncomfortable, and frustrating at times. But lightning is a far more consequential natural event.

Shouldn’t the Pope have stuck-it-out, and showed the special benefits that go with Faith and over the top Goodness? And if he had taken the strike, so-to-speak, who would have been responsible? Certainly not God, or are we regressing back to a pre-1752 act of Satan? I highly doubt it. Sure there was a recurrence or two in that time, but after Quiet Riot, Heavy Metal was on the wane. I just refuse to believe that Evil could be that mean. Surely not to the Pope. Sure, he’d been shot and the president would tell you, it was far more serious than the workings of Satan.

The guy was a Hater, and an Islamofascist of the worst kind, ahead of his time. A prototype for one of those who we were soon to find out hate us because of our way of life And our freedom. He and his kind make Satan seem like Nancy Drew. I had come to realize that Ozzy Osbourne looked less than Evil and more like a Lou Costello. And now that I think of it, Dee Snider of Twisted Sister looked like Nancy Drew, too, after you got in shape for the concert. I was ready for Supreme Goodness to prevail.

So here is what I would like to propose: That a group be set up and people in possession of Great Faith be recruited and issued tinfoil hats with high peaks on them like the Pope’s mitre [Ed.-That fish-shaped hat from the Cult of Dagon.] and metal staffs...say eight or nine feet in length capable of being collapsed telescopically to fit in a car trunk for transporting and stowing away during fair weather conditions. At the top of these staffs would be metal cartoon-hands with four-fingers like Reddy Kilowatt himself, who might pass for the Patron Saint of Electricity, with the index extended; like the foam rubber ones seen waving at athletic events with the team name or "We’re #1" on them.

In this case , I would suggest that the team name ought to be used as something suitable for the Purpose. New recruits or rookies, to use a sports term, could have staffs with collapsible umbrella canopies, but after serving an apprenticeship and qualifying for full membership, they would be given the longer model of full membership, and no umbrella. Belief alone could keep them dry, at least theoretically. Some details remain to be tested and worked out.

These Faithful would carry their staffs in inclement weather, braving rain and thunder and the power of Reddy Kilowatt himself, pointing the way toward Heaven. And to put the finish and flair to the ensemble, how about patent leather rain boots, with really large metal dancing taps on the soles, the better to beat out a few steps for the sheer joy of Witnessing for goodness in the face of the elements, like Gene Kelly, when he sang ‘Singing In the Rain’, seemingly oblivious to even the possibility of being struck by lightning. I propose this group of the Faithful be called the Conductors. It’s a snappy name, one might agree, positively crackling with energy.

And let me say that I am not all talk here--I would gladly do my part. Things like recruiting more of the Faithful, particularly at meetings where prominent Televangelists minister, and collecting membership fees to use to purchase and dispense the requisite uniform and supplies. But unfortunately, I have a delicate health condition, and one which renders me highly susceptible to dampness and sudden changes in the weather. A lifetime of doctor's visits and contributions to faith healers has not alleviated this. Yet, I stand ready to do my part--at least as much as can be rendered indoors. I eagerly await the flood of applications which will no doubt ensue like the torrential downpour that inspired it.

Ed.'s note: Jack, you're going to get hit by lightening for this.

Montgomery Blair Sibley: Well hung?


"I asked him to wear a suit and tie."
--Obama-accuser, Larry Sinclair.

Washington D.C
./Florida
--For those of you who don't know the story of Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, count yourself lucky. Sinclair has been claiming for some time that he had coke-fueled sex with the presidential candidate in a limousine in Gurnee, Illinois way back in 1999. Right, he's an annoying liar and an idiot.

Can he prove it? No. Does he have a criminal record? Yes, dating-back 27 years.
Is he so incredibly ugly that nobody in their right mind would fuck him, and certainly wouldn't be paying him for the sex? Correct. Is he insane? Probably, but some (other) bloggers wrote things that hurt his feelings, calling him a liar (which we can assume is accurate), and he tried to sue them. Now it's clear that he's just a disturbed sociopath. [Ed., 07.31.2009: and probably still is.]

By all appearances, Sinclair's going to keep trying, we can assume it's going to go nowhere and that he's going to lose miserably in any courtroom that would be stupid enough to accept his presence. Who would represent someone like this? Enter Montgomery Blair Sibley, an attorney I've actually communicated with: Sibley is currently suspended from practicing law in the District of Columbia and the State of Florida, apparently for frivolous litigation and filings.

In case you don't already know, Mr. Sibley was the third sequential attorney [Ed., 07.31.2009: partly-true--as criminal her counsel, but he was civil counsel very early on until January 2008.] for the troubled DC Madam, Jeane Palfrey. Palfrey fired Sibley sometime in January of this year, re-replacing him with her former criminal attorney, Preston Burton. Burton is currently representing the estate of Palfrey, but that's not stopping Sibley from trying to re-enter the picture. [Ed.,08.28.2008-This isn't to say that Burton is pure or unsullied in his motives, which remain unclear.] More on that later.

On Wednesday, Sinclair and counsel Sibley held a press conference at the National Press Club so that Sinclair could convey "evidence" of his alleged one night stand with Barack Obama. I wasn't there, and I'm glad. Anyone can rent a room there for such purposes, and reports state that Sinclair paid-out $4,100 USD for...I don't know what for. The stories are already becoming legend, but it's obvious that Sinclair has no evidence whatsoever, and that he was clutching his last 15 minutes of fame as hard as he could. In the spirit of things, counsel Sibley did likewise, and appeared at the press conference in a kilt. Yes, you read it correctly: a kilt.

Sibley was asked why he was wearing the kilt by an exasperated journalist, possibly from Reason magazine. Sibley's reply, from Huffington Post:
"I don't know why men wear pants. It's a function of male genitalia. If you're size normal or smaller, you're probably comfortable with [pants]. ... Those at the other end of the spectrum find them quite confining." In other words, he's saying that he's well-hung. Where is this coming from? Why all the filings of motions and complaints in the courts?
Sibley grew up in Rochester, N.Y., one of six siblings. "We're a big family, but nobody is crazier than Blair," says Harper Sibley Jr., Sibley's father and now a prominent South Florida developer. Sibley played rugby and several other sports with so much aggression that his father often picked him up from the hospital. Sibley's ambitions soon turned to the law. He graduated from the University of Miami and later from Albany Law School at Union University, returning to his hometown district attorney's office as a prosecutor for the next five years. After losing his bid for district attorney in 1987, Sibley headed to Miami. ("The Man Behind the Madam," Law.com, 03.30.2007)
Comparing the M.O. of the Sinclair case with Palfrey's, it's not hard to understand why hers just kept going-and-going-and-going, seemingly without end. Certainly, the client, the government, and her counsel contributed to this fact. Palfrey was clearly a troubled and disturbed individual, but is Sibley?

For that, we'll all have to wait-and-see, but there appear to be columns of thick, black smoke rising from the embattled attorney and his quest for the white whale. The prognosis is not good, not at all, especially considering that Sibley technically cannot represent Sinclair in D.C., though it's possible he could in New York and New Jersey. If any of this is about anything at all it's money, the American Dream (really a nightmare). Jeane, you should have taken the plea deal...


"The Man Behind the Madam," Law.com, 03.30.2007: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1175159039205

Montgomery Blair Sibley's May 8th Suspension from Practicing Law in the District of Columbia: http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/5/16/1914169/sibley-dc-suspension.pdf
"The Colorful Case of a Well-Named Lawyer," the Washington Post, 05.04.2007: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/03/AR2007050302233.html
Revised 06.23.2008

Postscript, 07.31.2009: At this point, considering the incredibly crappy coverage surrounding the Palfrey scandal and numerous others during the Bush II administration, I have to question the veracity of the Washington Post article. I'd also add that while Mr. Sibley might be considered eccentric, I've never seen any indication he had any nefarious intent as an attorney or a private citizen. Why he would wear a kilt to events like this is probably a matter of "doing battle." I can see and hear wise-ass journalists mocking him and Sibley making his retorts that were then conflated into a lot more than they really constituted. Such is public life...

Was Tim Russert a Divinely Inspired Hack?


Our Generally Crappy Mainstream Media
--Perhaps eclipsing the death of the last Pope, Rudolph Valentino, JFK, RFK, and Gerald Ford (still dead), we got an earful about the allegedly wonderful Meet the Press host over the last several days. The litany was endless over what a "great guy" Russert was, and just what an incredible journalist he'd been...except that he wasn't, and expect them to keep braying. And where's Russert's Oswald? It was his heart, it betrayed him after he betrayed all of us.

Granted, he cast a charming Irish spell on those of us who want to feel reassured by a journalist who doesn't ask the "hard" questions of public officials--something he rarely ever did, if ever. I never noticed any substantial questions. For those of us who don't want things to change for the better, and for those of us who are afraid of a truly dynamic democracy where there's supposed to be acrimony and disagreement, Tim Russert was Jesus.

There is one thing, and one thing only that the late Tim Russert should be remembered for: he and his counsel resisted testifying over his involvement in the Plame scandal, an incident that needs no explaining to anyone paying attention. Russert had crucial information on the outing of a CIA officer by members of the executive branch as part of a disinformation campaign surrounding the pretext for the war in Iraq, and he withheld it. So much for patriotism or principles, Russert was a crusader-in-disguise for creeping authoritarianism:
Russert was aware that a special prosecutor probing the leak of a CIA operative's name knew of his summer 2003 telephone conversation with Libby, and that Libby had released him from any promise of confidentiality. [Ed.-My emphasis.] But Russert, the Washington bureau chief for NBC News and host of "Meet the Press," and his attorneys argued in previously sealed court filings in June 2004 that he should not have to tell a grand jury about that conversation, because it would harm Russert's relationship with other sources. ("Russert Resisted Testifying On Leak," the Washington Post, 01.10.2006)
As this site has always contended, the livelihoods and careers of these so-called journalists are their main priority, and they believe in nothing. The "Fourth Estate" aren't concerned or worried about our rights, and therefore feel no connection to the social contract or the common good. What they care about is themselves only, but orders are orders. But man, the coverage of his death! Oh, the coverage! Wall-to-wall, just breathtaking.

CNN and other major television news outlets even told us that there was a rainbow shining during Russert's funeral, strangely begging the question that he--like El Presidente--was somehow touched by God (more like in the head).

Mark this, and mark it well:
whenever this system props-up a supplicant like Tim Russert for public deification, something is amiss, and the lies are flying. Court jesters had more courage than this clown ever did. Mediacrit.com sums-it-up best:
Being favored by Dick Cheney’s handlers doesn’t sound like a case for the journalism hall of fame, though.

In the case of Russert, we should consider what small impact “public affairs” journalism like Meet the Press has in these days of The Daily Show, social networking on the Internet, and Obama’s nontraditional campaign. I think the New York Times’ Media Equation columnist David Carr got it right when he observed that the mourning seemed not only for Russert, but an attempt to celebrate and shore up the increasingly irrelevant establishment political journalism. ("Mourning in America," Mediacrit.com, 06.19.2008)

All hail the death of establishment journalism. No, there's no reason at all to think of Tim Russert as anything but an American version of a commentator for Pravda under the Soviet regime, or a voice-over from a creaky old Nazi propaganda film. He was a stooge, a lapdog, and a moral coward without a shred of credibility.

Not that that makes him any different from his peers who attended his funeral this week, endlessly expounding on his (and their) fictitious merits as a journalist. His passing really is only relevant in relation to the Plame scandal.

Like most working within the world of the mainstream news media, he was not a man, but he was a traitor to himself, his family, and his nation. He will not be missed by those of us with the ability to reason, and history will judge him harshly. We're all born, and we all die. Tim Russert was no exception to this rule, and therefore, not special. Mourn the people he could have saved, save it. See you in the Emerald City, the Populists are off to meet the Wizard!The only problem is, they're shelling the Emerald City.

"Russert Resisted Testifying On Leak," the Washington Post, 01.10.2006: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/09/AR2006010901745.html

Mediacrit knocks it out of the park, June 19th, 2008:

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Songs from the Site Meter: The Return of the U.S. Army's 5th Signal Corps--Over Ret. Col. Ronald Roughead


Site Meter
--So guys, can you bring me that Zagnut next time around? And if you're diverting traffic from this site, or screwing around with anything, remember that that's a violation of my First amendment rights. It's illegal. I know, I know, orders are orders. Cyber units aren't a secret on the Internet, just so you know.

You have to wonder if Ron got any from that call to Pamela Martin & Associates, or if he was "getting some" for one of his superiors. Is he still working for SAIC after his retirement from the Pentagon? What difference does it make these days? Ken Silverstein should really give Ronald Roughead a visit sometime, he might discover something interesting, and it's only a short little hop around the corner from Capitol Hill to Alexandria.

Why did a former Defense Attache who was at the bombing of a U.S. Embassy in Kenya? Why did a recent former head of the Iraqi Media Network call the DC Madam's escort service in late-2005? Why did the brother of Navy's highest officer call? Nobody appears to want to know, which is curious...

Domain Name
army.mil ? (Military)
IP Address
139.139.35.# (HQ, 5th Signal Command)
ISP
HQ, 5th Signal Command
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Armed Forces Europe, Middle East, & Canada
City : Apo
Lat/Long : unknown
Language
English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System
Microsoft WinXP
Browser
Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022)
Javascript
version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit
Jun 14 2008 4:57:54 pm
Last Page View
Jun 14 2008 5:02:39 pm
Visit Length
4 minutes 45 seconds
Page Views
2
Referring URL
http://www.google.de...ad&meta=lr%3Dlang_en
Search Engine
google.de
Search Words
ron roughead
Visit Entry Page
http://chickasawpick...-man-at-703-836.html
Visit Exit Page
http://chickasawpick...ber-lifted-from.html
Out Click

Time Zone
UTC+1:00
Visitor's Time
Jun 14 2008 10:57:54 am
Visit Number
37,041


Thursday, June 12, 2008

The Significance of Today's Guantanamo Ruling at the Supreme Court: The Restoration of Habeas Corpus


Washington D.C.
--There should be parades and ticker-tape, but most Americans won't notice this...until it gets reversed again by our supine Congress. Well, they can try, but it's going to be an uphill battle now. Wondering why they won't move to impeach the President? Wonder no more, they're complicit in attempting to deprive all of us of our most precious liberties. Remember this at the ballot box and the coming barricades. The time for a new Constitutional Convention is coming, and coming sooner than you think.

Songs from the Site Meter: Friends of Randall Tobias?


SITE METER
--While John McCain and Twitt Romney tag-team on Barack Obama today, someone at Eli Lilly is still very concerned about former CEO Randall Tobias's association with the now-deceased DC Madam, Jeane Palfrey. Tobias now runs the Indianapolis Airport Authority, which contrary to what right-wing pundits are saying, is a major step down from his post as head of USAID at the State Department.

Yes, the disgraced Tobias was once a Deputy Secretary of State, but now he runs an airport frequently noted to have brothels ringing the area around it...uh, did I just write that? Hey, he has to get laid somehow. He and Dan Burton have to get some "leg," give them a break. Mark Foley, anyone?

Domain Name
lilly.com ? (Commercial)
IP Address
40.0.40.# (Eli Lilly and Company)
ISP
Eli Lilly and Company
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Indiana
City : Indianapolis
Lat/Long : 39.8062, -86.1407 (Map)
Language
English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System
Microsoft WinXP
Browser
Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; LLY-US-EN; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1)
Javascript
version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit
Jun 12 2008 2:56:41 am
Last Page View
Jun 12 2008 2:56:41 am
Visit Length
0 seconds
Page Views
1
Referring URL
http://www.google.co... website&btnG=Search
Search Engine
google.com
Search Words
dc madam website
Visit Entry Page
http://chickasawpick...-jeane-palfreys.html
Visit Exit Page
http://chickasawpick...-jeane-palfreys.html
Out Click

Time Zone
UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time
Jun 11 2008 2:56:41 pm
Visit Number
36,949

Kevin Martin's "The Bug" Drags Reggae into the 21st Century, Kicking and Screaming!

Who is "The Bug"? Who is this Kevin Martin? To say that Kevin Martin is a remarkable UK musician and producer who has worn many hats would be an understatement. Beginning with his Noise-Jazz combo, "God" in the late 80s, early 1990s, he cut an impressive musical-swath, even enjoying an LP produced by the legendary John Zorn. Martin has often been a favorite of Britain's edgy music periodical The Wire, a daring publication without any North American analog.

Going from God to ICE--a dub-themed project with former members of Head of David and Terminal Cheesecake--M
artin kept very close to the roots of reggae, ragga, soca, dancehall, but with the addition of elements of the hard rock, techno and industrial genres.

Eventually, ICE and the related Techno Animal projects with Justin K. Broadrick (Napalm Death, Godflesh, Jesu) went in the direction of a very controversial and iconoclastic hip-hop. But all-along, there were those interesting elements of Caribbean music, especially in the decidedly psyche
delic mixing usually associated with dub-reggae. Musical hybrids are one of those last routes towards innovation and the new, and it's frequently been the road to poverty. But tastes have changed dramatically in the last few years, and so have the fortunes of people like Martin, Broadrick, and even the "isolationist" Mick Harris. Dub is finally having its day.

Martin wasn't alone in his dub obsession during the 1990s, and he went as far as to compile two volumes of contemporary dub-mixing for Virgin Records under the moniker of "Macro Dub Infection," which included mixes by Tricky, Broadrick, Prince Paul, and Mick Harris of Scorn. Dub and dancehall are musical genres that never truly die, and this can be seen in the growing "dubstep" scene based in London, the worthy successor to drum-n'-bass (minimalist funk beats played at 45 RPM only hold the attention for so long).

With the demise of Techno Animal, Martin resurrected a little side-project called "The Bug," which began with a 1997 Wordsound LP with DJ Vadim titled "Tapping the Conversation," an ostensible replacement-score for Francis Ford Coppola's 1974 film "The Conversation," a meditation on surveillance culture. Unlike the recent releases, this was an ominous instrumental work of looming, monolithic and apocalyptic hip-hop. In 2003, Martin released "," an incredible collection of what can only be called a radical reworking of dub, dancehall, ragga & soca, melded with extremely dramatic and intense techno-stylings and genuine Jamaican and UK MCs.
Since that second Bug LP, Kevin Martin has been releasing an almost constant stream of singles (and compilations of them) with Jamaican and UK reggae/dancehall/dubstep MCs like Warrior Queen, Mexican, Ras B, Daddy Freddy, Roger Robinson, Cutty Ranks, and even the extraordinary Toastie Taylor of UK hip-hop group New Flesh. It just gets better-and-better with every release, and it's sure to scare the neighbors (always worthwhile), if not your parents (and animals within earshot).
The sound? Imagine listening to reggae in a free-fire zone, that should make sense. The only real analogy I can make with "The Bug" and his collaborators is that this is the kind of decadent, apoc
alyptic music you'd expect to hear in a bar scene from something like Blade Runner (yup, like Techno Animal's "Re-entry"). It's a kind of future music that can only be heard to be believed, but you can almost hear within it those sea shanties and old pirate songs that surely kicked-off Jamaican and Caribbean musics.

On June 30th, Ninja Tune releases the new LP, "London Zoo" in the UK, and it's expected in North America either simultaneously or shortly afterwards (Ninja Tune is a Canadian-based label founded by remixers Coldcut). It ain't exactly a dub purist's dream, but it'll do in a pinch. For that, check Mick Harris's Scorn. This would have made great music for the barricades in 1968. Check the singles of The Bug, there are several already available online, and they kill. Grace Jones has given a thumbs-up on the Bug. A collaboration is in order.


Track-list:

01 Angry

02 Murder We

03 Skeng

04 Too Much Pain

05 Insane

06 Jah War

07 Fuckaz

08 You & Me

09 Freak Freak

10 Warning

11 Poison Dart

12 Judgement
06.28.2008 Postscript: The American release on CD, MP-3 (which is a degraded and compressed form of audio), and WAXXX.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich's 35 Articles of Impeachment


Capitol Hill
--Let it be recorded that one man stood against the prevailing currents of Congress towards a Monarchial Fascism and proposed these 35 articles of impeachment against the standing President George W. Bush and his administration. Each article is laid-out in excruciating detail below the general explications below. See the links below for more commentary and detail. The Kucinich impeachment articles-text totals 65 pages.


Dennis J. Kucinich of Ohio
In the United States House of Representatives
Monday, June 9th, 2008
A Resolution

INDEX

Article I
Creating a Secret Propaganda Campaign to Manufacture a False Case for War Against Iraq.

Article II
Falsely, Systematically, and with Criminal Intent Conflating the Attacks of September 11, 2001, With Misrepresentation of Iraq as a Security Threat as Part of Fraudulent Justification for a War of Aggression.

Article III
Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction, to Manufacture a False Case for War.

Article IV
Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Posed an Imminent Threat to the United States.

Article V
Illegally Misspending Funds to Secretly Begin a War of Aggression.

Article VI
Invading Iraq in Violation of the Requirements of HJRes114.

Article VII
Invading Iraq Absent a Declaration of War.

Article VIII
Invading Iraq, A Sovereign Nation, in Violation of the UN Charter.

Article IX
Failing to Provide Troops With Body Armor and Vehicle Armor

Article X
Falsifying Accounts of US Troop Deaths and Injuries for Political Purposes

Article XI
Establishment of Permanent U.S. Military Bases in Iraq

Article XII
Initiating a War Against Iraq for Control of That Nation's Natural Resources

Article XIIII
Creating a Secret Task Force to Develop Energy and Military Policies With Respect to Iraq and Other Countries

Article XIV
Misprision of a Felony, Misuse and Exposure of Classified Information And Obstruction of Justice in the Matter of Valerie Plame Wilson, Clandestine Agent of the Central Intelligence Agency

Article XV
Providing Immunity from Prosecution for Criminal Contractors in Iraq

Article XVI
Reckless Misspending and Waste of U.S. Tax Dollars in Connection With Iraq and US Contractors

Article XVII
Illegal Detention: Detaining Indefinitely And Without Charge Persons Both U.S. Citizens and Foreign Captives

Article XVIII
Torture: Secretly Authorizing, and Encouraging the Use of Torture Against Captives in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Other Places, as a Matter of Official Policy

Article XIX
Rendition: Kidnapping People and Taking Them Against Their Will to "Black Sites" Located in Other Nations, Including Nations Known to Practice Torture

Article XX
Imprisoning Children

Article XXI
Misleading Congress and the American People About Threats from Iran, and Supporting Terrorist Organizations Within Iran, With the Goal of Overthrowing the Iranian Government

Article XXII
Creating Secret Laws

Article XXIII
Violation of the Posse Comitatus Act

Article XXIV
Spying on American Citizens, Without a Court-Ordered Warrant, in Violation of the Law and the
Fourth Amendment

Article XXV
Directing Telecommunications Companies to Create an Illegal and Unconstitutional Database of the Private Telephone Numbers and Emails of American Citizens

Article XXVI
Announcing the Intent to Violate Laws with Signing Statements

Article XXVII
Failing to Comply with Congressional Subpoenas and Instructing Former Employees Not to Comply

Article XXVIII
Tampering with Free and Fair Elections, Corruption of the Administration of Justice

Article XXIX
Conspiracy to Violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965

Article XXX
Misleading Congress and the American People in an Attempt to Destroy Medicare

Article XXXI
Katrina: Failure to Plan for the Predicted Disaster of Hurricane Katrina, Failure to Respond to a Civil Emergency

Article XXXII
Misleading Congress and the American People, Systematically Undermining Efforts to Address Global Climate Change

Article XXXIII
Repeatedly Ignored and Failed to Respond to High Level Intelligence Warnings of Planned Terrorist Attacks in the US, Prior to 911.

Article XXXIV
Obstruction of the Investigation into the Attacks of September 11, 2001

Article XXXV
Endangering the Health of 911 First Responders
____________

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FOR PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH


Resolved, that President George W. Bush be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:

Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against President George W. Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors.

In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has committed the following abuses of power.
_____________
ARTICLE I...

The actual Kucinich impeachment text, all 35 articles: http://www.democrats.com/files/amomentoftruth.pdf

The Village Voice, today: http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2008/06/kucinich_introd.php

A petition supporting Dennis Kucinich's articles of impeachment: http://www.democrats.com/35-articles-of-impeachment


Addendum: Rep Robert Wexler Co-sponsors Impeachment Measure

Dear Matt,

Our effort to hold the Bush/Cheney Administration accountable has taken another dramatic step forward. Last night, Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced the first Articles of Impeachment ever to be introduced against President Bush. It includes, in total, thirty-five Articles detailing this Administration's blatant abuse of power. Today, I enthusiastically co-sponsored this vitally important bill.

I am grateful for Dennis' leadership on this issue and for the steadfast support that countless Americans have given to both of our efforts to redeem our government and expose the crimes of Bush and Cheney.

I will now expand my efforts to secure impeachment hearings in the Judiciary Committee for these new Articles of Impeachment against President George W. Bush.

Many of the charges against President Bush are well known – and would shock the conscience of everyday Americans if only the national media would be willing to report on these stark facts.

The Articles present a stunning narrative of offenses that have go well beyond previous crimes committed by any US chief executive. In fact no President or Vice President in history has done more to undermine our constitution.

These charges are broad, with 35 separate allegations including the deliberate lies regarding WMDs that led us to war and the approval of illegal wiretapping of American citizens. The Articles also include new allegations of high crimes – including the explicit approval for high Administration officials to violate treaties and US law banning the use of torture.

The Democratic Party gained a majority in the House and Senate due in large part to our promises to end the corruption of the Republican majority and to hold the Administration accountable to the law. This courageous bill is a crucial step towards fulfilling this promise, but – like the Articles against Cheney – they require your support to convince Democrats and open-minded Republicans to support this bold but necessary action.

Time is running out so we must work together to spread the message and apply pressure.

First, please encourage your friends and family members to sign up at WexlerWantsHearings.com – as it will allow us to keep in touch with you and speak to a wider audience. If you haven't yet put in your phone and address, please sign up again, as we will be doing telephone town halls in the near future.

Second, call your representative and urge them to support Impeachment hearings.

Finally, contact newspapers, news stations, and your favorite bloggers and urge them to report on this movement. We need to keep Impeachment a significant news story until the Democratic leadership sees the value in it.

McClellan Agrees to Testify:

I was pleased to inform you yesterday that Judiciary Committee Chairman Conyers met my call to have Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan testify under oath. I am thrilled to inform you that McClellan has agreed to testify on June 20th at 10AM. This will be the first step in what we hope will be ongoing and deepening examinations of the stark evidence and charges against both President Bush and Vice President Cheney.

Thank you for your continued passion and advocacy. Your support means so much to me.

Sincerely,

Congressman Robert Wexler

DONATE


Monday, June 09, 2008

Good Luck Trying to See John Cusack's "War, Inc."


Our Generally Crappy Mainstream Media
--John Cusack, a household name in almost every American home, has a new movie out that's a satire on our current era. The studios don't want you to see this film, obviously, because...get real, they're part of the problem in our business dominated society. Nonetheless, this movie is a really hard sell when reality is more absurd than almost any satire (even Dr. Strangelove).

Like the Scott McClellan book, it was decided that you and I don't want or need to see Cusack's movie. In case you haven't noticed, our culture is forced on us, rather than something that's created by ordinary people with something to say, as it used to. Looking through Sunday's paper, I couldn't find this "War, Inc." anywhere! By God, in 1985, we got Terry Gilliam's "Brazil" here, and it only hit 200-300 screens in America!
Hi Matt,

Thanks for visiting our web site. We're pleased that you took the time to inquire about "War, Inc." playing in South Bend. We hope to open this film soon!

Contrary to popular belief it is often the film's distributor who determines the availability of films, not the theatre. Some films will open in over 3000 theatres -- other films open exclusively in New York and Los Angeles and gradually expand from there. The majority of films have release patterns somewhere between these two extremes. The theatres potential for attendance is always a factor when determining availability.

The distributor opened this film in only 23 theatres.

Here's a sampling of other theatre counts for comparison purposes:

- "Indiana Jones 4" is playing in 4264 theatres

- "Chronicles of Narnia 2" is playing in 3851 theatres

- "Iron Man" is playing in 3650 theatres

We appreciate your interest and hope you understand the process we must go through.

Kindest regards, Scott Cottingham

Kerasotes.com

Do I blame Scott and Kerasotes? Of course not. The distributor was/is First Look Films, a very-very small player in the field, though very good at availability with the DVD format.

Nobody in Hollywood wanted to finance this film, and it was only able to raise $8 million, filming in Bulgaria to lower its costs. Hollywood is OK with financing pro-military ventures, so it's not a surprise. This is how things have changed with media distribution, but at least we have an economical format like DVD that smaller distributors can fall back on. VHS was the pits!

Press Release from Montgomery Blair Sibley, former counsel for DC Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey


Ed.
--This arrived in my mailbox around 11:00 am. Do we really need a retrial of the charges against Jeane to establish who gets her remaining (known) assets? Just more loose-ends...


Judge Robertson Sets Status Hearing
In Palfrey Case



Greetings:

As you all know, Jeane died on May 1, 2008, in an apparent suicide.

As a result, Judge Robertson was required to dismiss the criminal charges against her thus ending the criminal suit. See: Order of May 20, 2008.

The dismissal of the criminal case lifts the stay of the civil forfeiture of Jeane's seized assets -- which total over $1.5 million -- and that civil case will now proceed. That stay order was entered to prevent Jeane from being able: "to obtain an impermissible advantage and to prejudice the Government’s position in this criminal prosecution."

Judge Roberts has set a status conference for Tuesday, June 17, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 23A. At that time, the Judge will address the substitution for Jeane by a representative of Jeane's estate to contest the forfeiture of Jeane's assets.

That contest could ultimately result in a complete re-trial of the matters raised in the criminal case with the significant difference that the rules of civil procedure would allow broad discovery of information that the government was able to block from use in the criminal matter. That information includes, among other data, the names of 855 customers of the Jeane's escort service and their telephone numbers saved for -- but oddly not used -- in the criminal trial and heretofore never publicly revealed which are presently in the custody of the undersigned.

As always, if you (i) would like me take your name from this mailing list or (ii) have any questions, please contact me.

Montgomery Blair Sibley, Chartered
Attorney & Counselor at Law
Admitted to Practice: New York

www.civilforfeiture.com
1629 K Street, N.W.
Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20006
202-508-3699
202-478-0371 (E-Fax)

A timely joke, sent in by a reader...


The J-7 Mailbag
(no anthrax here!)--This one works for me, it made me laugh out-loud (LOL):

I-95 both north and south of Washington D.C. is backed up for miles and men can be seen with plastic buckets walking from car to car. One of the stopped motorists sees a guy approach and asks, "What's the problem?"

"Well'" the guy says, "you must not have heard the news, but terrorists have grabbed the President, Cheney, Karl Rove, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and Anne Coulter and are holding them hostage for $300 million. If their demands are not met they are threatening to douse them all with gasoline and burn them alive. So we're taking up a collection."

"That's awful," says the motorist. "How much have you collected so far?"

The guy with the bucket says, "So far, we're averaging about two gallons a car."

Ed.--That'll learn ya.' Don't mess with Tejas.

Friday, June 06, 2008

George W. Bush Achieves Highest Disapproval Rating of Any American President, Yet Has the Protection of Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller


Washington D.C.
--This is an unsurprising effect of the high price of oil and the snowballing effect it's having on the American economy and the price of nearly everything. What's amazing is, prices have been high for some time, but we're now even seeing the upper middle-class taking some hits.

That's right, Ed McMahon is going into foreclosure on his home, and has been for several years now. What if he got something in the mail from himself? The irony should be leavened with him winning. How did he spend it all?

Never mind him: CBS has conducted a poll--released today--that has George W. Bush at the very top...of the most unpopular presidents in American history. In a sense, you have to love it, and many of us are getting to enjoy some payback for all of the gloating in 2004. Gloating over another stolen election is perverse, incidentally.

Be careful what you wish for, you might get it, and get it good, my humble curse. In the spirit of this political moment, GOP presidential candidate John McCain is going to take his own hits over his support of the Bush administration and their overall agenda in his bid for the White House.

According to the CBS poll, Bush stands at a 67% disapproval rating (the highest for any standing president), and a 25% approval rating. Who are the 25%? Many of them are that past-crop of millionaires, billionaires, old money, tech money, the defense contracting sector, very stupid small businesspeople, the energy and financial sectors, and all of the rest of the middling-types and petty bourgeois who service them.

Forget the poor, and forget the so-called threat of international terrorism--these people are a threat to the rest of human civilization, and marvel at the fact that many of them are being enriched by the current excesses of the White House and Congress. Jail is for those who have no connections, the losers who don't own a representative or a few judges. Of course, there is that percentage in the "25%" who are so racist, so lockstep nationalist, so homophobic, so warmongering, and so religiously insane, that they're going to vote against their interests until they kick it.

And yesterday,
the Senate Intelligence Committee's chairman Jay Rockefeller(D-Wv.) said upon the release of their report on the lies that led to the war in Iraq (their fourth-release on the issue of statements without the backing of valid intelligence data):
“The tragic fact is, on issues of war and peace, which should require the most meticulous and the most precise adherence to the truth, the administration was too often careless with its words, including in some cases making presentations that were not substantiated by the available intelligence — or worse, directly contradicted by the available intelligence,” Rockefeller said. “The administration went well beyond what the intelligence community knew and what it believed.”

Rockefeller said Democrats would not formally prosecute the point against the administration because doing so would automatically shut down relations between the legislative and executive branches.

“It would mean nothing else, whether it’s clean air or FISA, would get done,” he said. “It’s like pressing for impeachment. It’s a grand act with only five or six months to go. It’s a futile act and it’s a wrong act, because we do have business to do. Should it be done in the wide sweep of history? Yes. Should it be done by us, now? No.” ("Citing new report, Dems rip "heinous' pre-war rhetoric," The Hill, 06.05.2008)

And yet, the Democrats were too soft on the Bush administration, and there were no solid-commitments towards punishing the White House for lying to the American public. Quite the contrary. There should be immediate calls for impeachment hearings based on the findings of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and they should be done as swiftly as humanly possible.

If this means a complete shutdown of relations between the Congress and the White House, that's to be expected and accepted as part of the process of checks and balances that is the responsibility of the legislative branch. It's a responsibility that the Democratic Party has long given-up on, making lame excuses that have no merit constitutionally.

The problem in Congress is a Senator like Jay Rockefeller (or Joe Lieberman, Dick Lugar, et. al. ...), a representative who's beholden to AT&T, as well as the Bush administration itself. It's representatives like him that have given Congress the lowest approval-ratings--lower even than the current president--in the history of the Republic. But what Rockefeller is most beholden to is protecting his own interests within the structures of American Empire. Recall that the Rockefeller dynasty owns Chase-Manhattan Bank, their interests being broad:

It's also worth pointing out that the Jay Rockefeller who today accuses the Bush administration of inventing the threat posed by Iraq-al Qaeda collaboration once saw "a substantial connection" between the two and warned about the consequences of leaving Iraq to pass its WMD to Osama bin Laden. On February 5, 2003, Rockefeller said: "The fact that Zarqawi certainly is related to the death of the U.S. aid officer

and that he is very close to bin Laden puts at rest, in fairly dramatic terms, that there is at least a substantial connection between Saddam and al Qaeda."

It's also worth pointing out that the Jay Rockefeller who today accuses the Bush administration of inventing the threat posed by Iraq-al Qaeda collaboration once saw "a substantial connection" between the two and warned about the consequences of leaving Iraq to pass its WMD to Osama bin Laden. On February 5, 2003, Rockefeller said: "The fact that Zarqawi certainly is related to the death of the U.S. aid officer and that he is very close to bin Laden puts at rest, in fairly dramatic terms, that there is at least a substantial connection between Saddam and al Qaeda."("Jay Rockefeller's Amnesia," The Weekly Standard, 06.05.2008)

Watch Jay Rockefeller bend-over-backwards for retroactive immunity for the telecommunications companies in the lawsuits filed against them for their participation in the White House's warrantless surveillance program. His close relationship with AT&T surely has something to do with it, yet he wrote a letter to Vice President Cheney (keeping his own sealed-copy to cover himself for later) over his concerns with the legality of the program during its early-days.

It seems Senate Intelligence Committee chair Rockefeller was "in-the-loop" with the neoconservatives then and now, and has made his bed with the most storied administration in our nation's history. He should recuse himself from further work on the committee, and he's hardly alone. Michael Moore's site is calling Rockefeller a "spineless Democrat." That's inaccurate: he's complicit with the Bush administration's criminality, along with most of the current incumbents on Capitol Hill.

And this is why Jay Rockefeller's begging-the-question over impeachment proceedings. He's a dishonorable and disingenuous criminal of the highest order, and should be facing impeachment himself. But what do you expect from the descendants of an oil robber baron who was instrumental in giving us our current petrochemical crisis?

One word: ATTICA--because being a Rockefeller means being on the wrong side of history.

"Jay Rockefeller's Amnesia," The Weekly Standard, 06.05.2008: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/181kczhv.asp

Today's CBS Poll on President Bush's Historic Disapproval Ratings: http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/0608econ.pdf

The Iraq Report on Bush administration statements during the runup to our current war: http://rockefeller.senate.gov/press/phase2publicstatements.pdf

Senator Rockefeller's page that leaves-out statements the public disagrees with him on (the impeachment issue): http://rockefeller.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=298774

What Senator Rockefeller REALLY said at the release hearing: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/citing-new-report-dems-rip-heinous-prewar-rhetoric-2008-06-05.html