|
Ron Brynaert, former editor of Raw
Story, has some curious issues, one of which is he is being sued by Aaron
Walker, who blogs as Aaron Worthing. The funny thing about the Walker lawsuit is that he
hasn’t been served, while the other parties to the suit have been, or at
least Mr. Walker has attempted to serve two of the other parties, of which
only one person has replied to the suit. Ron Brynaert though has not been
served, nor has Mr. Walker chosen to serve him, nor has he even attempted to
serve him. I ask why?
A number of people have speculated
that Mr. Brynaert has went over to Mr. Walker attempting to gain influence so
Mr. Walker will remove him from the suit, or have Mr. Brynaert become a
hostile witness against the two other parties to
this frivolous lawsuit. It is strange that as of today, with this
suit being several months old, that the other parties have been either served
or attempts were made to serve them, yet Ron Brynaert has been curiously left
out of that service. Brynaert of course refuses to answer these and other
more pressing questions posed to him, and instead deflects these questions on
the lawsuit by saying:
As for Aaron Walker thinking it
was dumb to include him in the suit, it was because of Ron Brynaert outing
Mr. Aaron Walker’s real identity that caused the suit to commence. So to
leave Ron Brynaert out of the lawsuit seems somewhat out of place, especially
since the lawsuit hinged on Ron Brynaert being the initial bad guy in the
suit. So Brynaert’s response seems phony and suspicious at the least. There
are people who do believe that Ron is on some Blues Brothers type Mission
From God to insert himself into the right wing camp so he can gather evidence
for his co-defendant in the suit so they can win one for the gipper I guess.
But this is all speculation at this point, and I for one don’t wish to
disparage Ron for attempting to gain evidence against these malicious right
wing extremists, whom a number of state and federal agencies are currently
investigating. At this point in time Ron seems preoccupied with Weinergate
and still trying to wean information about Rep Weiner and the supposed fake
twitter accounts that brought him down.
There are a number of issues with
Ron, one of which was detailed here which that article has shown to
be very truthful when it comes to dealing with the mental problems that Ron
is suffering from.
Ron will threaten people if they
don’t do what he asks, then he will attempt to extort people if they refuse
to talk with him, and he will basically NOT follow any
journalistic ethics whatsoever, even while trying to claim he is an objective
reporter. As an example this tweet today to BU:
So he starts a blog about someone,
then tells them to give him everything they have on his pet project or he
will start posting at a blog he already opened – which has a main purpose of
exposing his own relationship with the person he claims was a source for him
– which he now wishes to expose as a fraud. So this is how Ron deals with
sources. He plays them for all he can get, then blows them out of the water
after trying to extort something from them when those sources realize he is a
nutjob. Criminal charges should be sought for such activity, but that is just
how I feel about it. Of course if this is some undercover mission for Ron to
show the right wingers he is trying to get in bed with that he is on their
side, well, I think its probably a foolish crusade to say the least. And
whomever hatched such an operation should have their heads examined. Ron is
not the sharpest tool in the box, nor is he even the dullest tool, he is in
effect the broken tool. And anyone who ends up believing in him will
eventually suffer from that belief, right wingers included.
Ron is also being sued by his
former employer Raw Story for disclosing confidential information on one of
their employees after he took a huge settlement for basically getting fired
from his job. He signed a confidentiality agreement with Raw Story never
to discuss events surrounding his employment there or his
termination and took a big fat paycheck home for signing that agreement. But
later after taking Raw Story to the cleaners financially, he then started
disclosing information about them to others through emails, tweets and so
forth, or so the story goes. We here at BU have yet to uncover the actual
lawsuit, but if we come across it we will be sure to dig through it and post
any relevant things found. Until then Ron has a lot on his plate to deal
with, so I guess it is best to just be wary of him and his delicate mental
state. If anyone seeks him out I suggest you run before you get involved with
him. If he seeks you out, run for the hills.
UPDATE: Ron tweeted this to BU:
OK, let me get this straight. A
source under a confidential agreement with you gives you an account of an
event, but you fail to check on it or even vet the story line and decide to
publish on your own without checking anything but the sources story, then you
later blame the source for the information not meeting your expectations, and
then blow your own source out by publishing all the confidential emails
between you? I would say that is failing as a journalist to check any news
item that a source gives you prior to publishing it. It is your fault, not
the sources fault for the story you eventually did. Your failure as a
journalist is not your sources problem no matter how much you wish to shove
that responsibility over to the source. As the journalist in any story you
must check facts out first prior to publication, if not, it is YOU
that is to blame for any story problems later on, not the source. It is your
responsibility as a journalist to check facts before saying anything. If you
fail to do that, then it is on YOUR head, not your sources
head. Your the journalist, not the source. Thus you shoulder the blame for
not verifying the accuracy of what you are reporting on. If you claim it is
the source that is at fault, and then go out and force that responsibility
onto them, then no one would ever agree to source for you again for fear that
you would fail to research any given story, and thus blame them later on for
your own failures as a journalist. So try and remember it is your
responsibility to check facts of any story given to you first or prior to
publication, fail that and you have only yourself to blame for any negative
outcomes. And you were an editor for Raw Story? Wow, you must have been
terrible at that job if some lowly blogger has to tell you, a former Editor
for a major publication, how to write, edit or publish story material
ethically.
Share
and Enjoy
9
Comments
Texas
Tim
May 02, 2012
You
are wrong about Ron. He knows exactly what he is doing–he is like the mad
scientist. No one lives in NYC without a job. He is a paid troll — virtually
everything he does is for disinformation. Remember that post he did about
Socrates where he said that he was Stuart Simms from Chicago. Total
horseshit, but he wrote it with such conviction. But it was to protect Seth
Allen. Now he is trying to protect Aaron Walker because Walker has been using
him for months to infiltrate the left. The reason Walker sued Ron was to
cover Ron’s ass, and that’s why he did not serve him. Ron is being paid by
Team Breitbart. I know you think that Ron is really being a trojan horse for
Rauhauser, but look at him. He outed Walker after Walker was outed in court,
and then Walker used Ron’s outing to sue Kimberlin and Rauhauser while
pretending to sue Bryneart. It’s like the DEA who does an arrest and takes
the informant in too so they don’t blow his cover. Ron is an informant for
the right. And I don’t doubt that he was the one who swatted Stack in order to
blame it on Rauhauser. That’s what Ron does, he lies and lies and lies, and
then makes up a story to spread disinformation. Mark my words, Ron is being
paid big money by the right to distract the left. He is the master of
disinformation and lies. He stands for nothing, has no ethics whatsoever, and
that’s why he was sued by Raw. Ron is an agent provocateur, but the problem
is that he has no loyalties and he will work for attention. Ron is a victim
of the Stockholm Syndrome sucking on the pole of Aaron Walker while
detectives from New Jersey seek voice mails samples of to test against the
swatting tape.
But
you are right about one thing, if anyone relies on anything Ron writes,
tweets, or says, they might as well rely Ted Bundy to babysit their daughter
because he will totally screw them, twist their words, and leave them in a
pile of horseshit.
admin
May 02, 2012
Thank
you Texas Tim, We will sure start looking at all that information you posted
and write more posts as we dig deeper. Thank you for that information.
Texas
Tim
May 02, 2012
No
problem. I am betting money that Ron’s Kimberlin post has resulted in calls
to Kimberlin from everyone who is investigating Ron — Kimberlin probably has
voice mails and other information that could help on the Stack case and the
Raw Story suit. If, as Ron says, he promised Kimberlin confidentiality and
broke that then that would be very powerful evidence in the Raw Story suit.
And if Kimberlin tape recorded any conversations with Ron or has voice mails,
the feds would probably be very interested in those. I see this Ron character
really going over the deep end. He is attacking Frey, Kimberlin, Allen, while
sucking on Walker’s pole. He has probably been bedding Nagy as she delivers
his paycheck from Walker. Now that is one hell of a weird dude. BTW, did I
hear that Ron actually violated the Raw confidentiality agreement because he
was jealous of a gay relationship by some of the Raw staffers. Is Ron gay?
Inquiring minds want to know.
NYPD
Blue
May 03, 2012
Sorry
guys, you are both wrong. I work in Long Island and I know all about Mr.
Brynaert. We call him “Bry the Lie.” His is a paid confidential informant working
for a law enforcement agency that has been engaging in them so-called dirty
tricks and profiling to keep our country safe. Mr. Bry has been used to
infiltrate both the left and the right and that is why he can do and say
anything with impunity. He is being paid and told to incite, play the nice
guy, play the bad guy, troll, make threats and hate on people. Every stroke
of his keyboard and every phone call he makes is monitored in real time by
LE. He is living in an apartment paid for by LE. You want to know who tipped
off Mr. Kimberlin to the identity of Mr. Walker–it was Bry. You want to know
who tipped you off to the identity of Mr. Farahnak — it was Bry. You guys are
smart so look at the timeline. Bry was publicly saying he was trying to
discover the identity of those two and then, boom, they are all of a sudden
outed. Well, my little friend, that is because he used his LE connections to
find out who they were and then leaked the info as anonymous tips.
OK,
I will walk you through this a little more since it seems like you guys need
some help. Why is Bry so focused on Mr. Rauhauser? Well, because of Mr.
Rauhauser’s connection to Anonymous and Occupy, groups that are causing us a
lot of grief here. Why is Bry so involved with Mr. Walker? Because of Mr.
Walker’s incitement of Muslims, which is a big issue for LE here in NY. Don’t
think for one second that Mr. Walker is not being totally monitored by a
number of LE Agencies. That guy is a walking time bomb so Bry is doing
everything possible to work him. Why is Bry so involved with Mr. Stack? Well,
again, it has to do with issues important to NY LE — Congressman Weiner.
Where do you think the tip came from that Mr. Rauhauser swatted Mr. Stack?
Yes, it was from Bry because LE figured they could kill two birds with one
stone. Come on guys, have you ever seen someone so focused on so many
important people for no apparent reason? You asked WHY? at the beginning of
this post, and now you know. Ron Brynaert is working for the man. He is not a
rat, he is a paid informant and there is a big difference. He has handlers,
he has special numbers to call, and he has instructions to follow. Of course
he has issues, but those issues make him the perfect, at least until now,
confidential informant. He can infiltrate people and groups by telling them
that he is a reporter, or just interested in the truth or whatever.
All
of Bry’s antics on the Net a part of his disinformation campaign — he wants
people to be totally confused about whether he is right or left, whether he
is sane or insane, whether he is a reporter or gadfly. I have ben laughing at
all you guys trying to figure him out. Come on dudes, he’s Forest Gump mixed
with Columbo, right in the middle of everything our illustrious police force
is interested in. And he has been involved with a lot of covert ops against
Occupy, Muslims, Anonymous and other groups perceived as threats that people
don’t even know about yet.
So
there you have it, Bry may now have to take on a new persona and leave Long
Island because his CI status is exposed. But he has served his usefulness so
it’s time….
Texas
Tim
May 04, 2012
NYPD,
I may have to eat crow on this one. You sound like you are speaking from
personal knowledge about Ron. He sure had me fooled—I thought he was just
trolling but what you say about him being a paid confidential informant for
the cops sounds not just plausible but probable. I need to go back and look
at everything Bry in this new light. Ron Brynaert, Working For The Man, who
would have thunk it??? Wait till twitter gets ahold of this — soon, he will
probably have to be tweeting from some undisclosed location. Actually, hasn’t
Ron been hiding from people for months — now it makes sense why he won’t tell
anyone his address or phone number. NYPD gave us a hint — Long Island, New
York. Hey Occupy, Hey Anonymous where are you? What’s the GPS on Ron
Brynaert? Inquiring minds want to know!!!
So
let me break this down, Ron is a gay rat who lies to his employer and his
sources after he promises them confidentiality. He is ratting on Occupy,
Anonymous, and many others in order to keep them confused about his motives
and his loyalties. But now NYPD has enlightened us all by blowing Ron’s cover
once and for all. Heck of a job, Ronny boy.
Come
to think of it, hmmm. Ron is being paid by the man so anything that Ron has
done illegally has been done “under color of law” so he could be sued for
violating civil rights along with his handlers. Ron, you just became a
liability. Hey, Frey, you should sue Ron under 1983 for violating your civil
rights — you could prob get a lot of money from the cops who are directing
him. Ron wouldn’t be the first rat informant who brought down his handlers.
Food for thought.
NYPD
Blue
May 04, 2012
Sorry
Texas Tim, I have to call you out on a few things. Here in NY, we don’t care
whether people are gay or not and in Bry’s case, that’s an asset because he
can use that for his job in certain circumstances. Bry has the capability to
mingle as a straight or as a gay depending on the situation. But being gay is
certainly not something he should be bashed about. You would be surprised how
many gays are serving for NYPD LEs.
The
other thing–you called Bry a “rat.” That is a negative word and usually means
someone who tells LE about crimes in which he or she is involved, like the
drug user on the street who gets busted and then rats on the supplier. But in
Bry’s case, he is not a rat at all. Instead, he is a paid confidential
informant and he does what he is told to do. I don’t mean to say that
everything is always clear sailing with Bry — he is quite a strange bird
sometimes — but if he is told to infiltrate Occupy, he spends weeks
identifying the people involved and then approaches them in various ways and
using various socks and personas to try to get information about them. He has
been good at what he does, even when he is a pain.
I
realize that you are a Texas boy and your terminology is different than what
we use here in NY, but you still have to be careful with your language so it
isn’t used disparagingly.
One
final thing, as for your color of law argument. Bry does push the envelope
and he has crossed the line from time to time. But as a CI, no LE anywhere in
the country is going to touch him. As for a civil suit, that could get dicey
if someone sued him under color of law and it got to the discovery stage. But
IMHO, there will be forces that intercede on his behalf so I do not expect
such a case to get past any motion to dismiss. This is not to say that Bry or
LE would not be concerned…but here in NY, we have many CIs that do a lot of
illegal stuff and they never get prosecuted or sued. And when they do get too
hot, like Sabu, they get moved.
Texas
Tim
May 05, 2012
OK
NYPD, sorry, hard to break habits after living 45 years around rednecks here
in Lubbock. Will be more careful from now on. But still, I am in shock that
Ron is working for the man setting up his fellow Americans and making intel
dumps against people who are pushing for change. Maybe he just got so angry
at Raw for firing him that he decided to turn against the left. Kinda the
opposite of Brock. But, and I hate to admit it, you are probably right. I
have spent hours today reading Ron’s tweets, posts, and comments, and I am
shocked but your tip is the only thing that makes sense. There is no other
reason for his fixation on certain people other than to make his case to the
man. I mean, he has no ideology, he has no loyalties, and he is not making
any money through his blogging. So you are exactly right, he is getting paid
by the cops to provide intel about people, and to stir things up so he can
remain relevant and be a honey pot. My oh my, he is a sly dog alright. His
Vinnie the Chin/Columbo act had a lot of people fooled. Gotta shake my head
one more time…Ron Brynaert, working for the man.
Texas
Tim
May 11, 2012
OK,
looks like Ron just confirmed NYPD Blue comments above about him having
strong connections to NYPD. Reading Ron’s tweets tonight, it seems oh so
clear that Aaron Walker is trying to extort $20,000 from Ron with a blackmail
threat and it sho’ looks like Ron has friends at NYPD who are can nail Mr.
Walker if they get the order. Ron’s tweets:
Ron
Brynaert @ronbryn
If I report $20,000 extortion threat to NYPD it will be backed with proof of
how fugitive @Neal_Rauhauser menaces for lulz @OccupyRebellion
Ron
Brynaert @ronbryn
..will compel me to report his extortion threat to NYPD, along with a record
of how all his friends helped. Blackmail is a serious crime.
Ron
Brynaert @ronbryn
My blackmailer is advised that any allusions to me at all on his blog or
twitter regarding crimes, which I agree have been committed by NR
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
I take $20,000 extortion threat extremely seriously, though @stranahan thinks
it’s a joke. I hope my blackmailer backs off @CryingWolfeBlog
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
And I just told you I will report it, if my blackmailer carries on with the
threats he tried to extort $20,000 from me to stop @Stranahan
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
I answer you honestly but you still duck my questions and mock me. If I’m
harassed again by my blackmailer I will def go to NYPD @Stranahan
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
I’d suggest @Patterico etc. look up the NYS law on extortion. Trying to
blackmail me for $20,000 is a crime. @Stranahan
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
If I’m menaced, smeared or falsely called criminal by @Patterico @Dust92 or
my blackmailer again I’m going straight to the NYPD. @Stranahan
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
leaked emails and contributed to his lawsuit, they are part of an actual
criminal conspiracy not an imaginary one. @Patterico @Stranahan
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
I don’t ever plan on emailing or tweeting my blackmailer’s name again but
since @Patterico @Prepostericity @Liberty_Chick all… @Stranahan
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
I think my blackmailer was menaced by NR but he committed a major crime.
Especially since his lawsuit is full of lies @Patterico @Stranahan
5h
Ron Brynaert @ronbryn
Lee, Do you know that extortion is a crime? A pal of @Patterico tried to
blackmail me for $20,000 and I might report to police @Stranahan
Of
course, all of this is my opinion, but I have to concur generally on all of
this about Brynaert:
The
first thing that tipped me off to his possibly being a CI is that he was
accusing others of it in the blessedly few emails we exchanged, he’s a real
piece of work (and other forms of crack-laced excretion). What’s interesting
is that he uses classic, timeworn methods to bait people into communicating
with him, throws a few tidbits of information out there and waits. One of the
easiest ways to shake someone down for information is to get them angry or
despondent, to instill fear in them also works wonders, not that I do the
latter two myself, I go conventional routes or tell a source to put up or
shut up, never this borderline (as far as we know) method of his that smacks
of undue pressure, call it what you want. CIs are constantly engaging in
projection, it’s what they do.
The
best antidote is not to respond or to interact with him in any capacity [Ed.-I should follow my own advice someday...],
block him, retraining order, whatever it takes, don’t interact, let him fade
into the shadows of whatever Bronx shithole neighborhood he slithered out of.
He
seems like a stellar case of a journalist (I’m not one, by the way) who got
in way too deep at some point in the game, maybe even outside of the
profession itself, and he reminds me a lot of Jason Leopold in that sense.
Some of these people will literally do anything to get the information for a
story. Besides past run-ins with the NYPD, I could see him working sources
from them and getting snared in a web, stupidly thinking they won’t use him
up one day, like they’ve done with countless CIs who aren’t as ruthless as
they are. I’m hoping that’s the case with Roy. This clown deserves a book on
himself one day, and he’s likely to get it.
In
my case he posted emails from the DC Madam case (I was on the defense for a
time as a researcher, I crossed paths with Rawstory during it, when he was
exec. editor) online between Larisa Alexandrovna and Palfrey that pertained
to me! That one’s a long story, but Palfrey was setting people off against
one another (Roy might take a few lessons from her subtle actions)to keep
them away from parts of her story that were inculpatory, would point towards
guilt, and I was one target initially.
Anyway,
he was baiting Alexandrovna and Rawstory with that, and probably me, I found
it accidentally doing a fact check on something totally unrelated. I believe
Alexandrovna responded to him on the thread too, under an avatar, fine, works
for me, I would too in their situation. Let’s just say that he made comments
in emails to me that indirectly related to the lawsuit against him and that
they may or may not indicate he cannot play nice in the workplace. Of course,
one would never get this from his interactions online (I jest).
He’s
got nothing with the assertions of blackmail above or he would have gone to
NYPD already and filed charges. That’s intimidation and undue pressure on his
part, but if he’s a CI he’s knows nothing will happen to him–like Bill
Bastone who leaked an unsigned warrant-affidavit in Palfrey’s case, the very
first story on it, creating the scandal in the process. Either Bastone and
Brynaert are police assets (fine to a point, but there’s a line) or CIs, if
you see any difference, it’s probably marginal. Ronnie’s running a puppet
show and he’s being found out, people tired of him long ago from what I can
tell.
My
first question, however, was: “How does this guy support himself in NYC
without a real job now?” There has been talk that he and Rawstory had a
settlement over some incident(s) he was party to, that he was paid-out to
leave, which if true says it all about him. But who would know. I searched
online dockets and have yet to find a suit between him and Rawstory, and that
leads me to believe this is perhaps happening out of court. To be sure, I
hope that they win against him if what’s being bandied about online even has
a kernel of truth to it. If he’s a CI, there’s a whole slew of other issues
to contend with. Based on his behaviors and mindset, I have to personally
conclude that he’s an informant, he fits the bill, like William O’ Neal (the
Fred Hampton job) or any number of off-kilter individuals who got themselves
into those situations and roles.
He
shows a relentless tendency to manipulate and intimidate people he targets,
or even who cross paths with him, such as myself. My personal opinion is that
he’s deeply disturbed and that civil society is gradually tiring of him and
his playing around with the lives of others. The other thing is that he’s
probably outlived his usefulness now that his cover’s been blown, and either
way, CI or a nutty bunny, it’s blown for good. You cannot unring a bell.
Here’s
to his defeat at the hands of Rawstory. If he’s a provocateur, he’s a dud
who’s being thrown away, because if it’s established with absolute certainty
that he is, it won’t be forgotten by anyone. There’s a reason for secrecy in
the CI programs in the US. It’s the Holy of Holies of law enforcement in
flatfoot nation.
And that was it, I noticed that he never responded and got it pulled. recently. He's also likely to do that with this article while he does far worse to others without any obvious consequences. People have a right to their opinions when it comes to public behavior, and the Internet is as public as it gets.
And, so I thought it was over. Ron had come my way, bothered me a lot, tried to make leading statements, tried to cast my own statements in a weird light I'd have never imagined, and was unpleasant enough for me to consider it a not-so-subtle form of harassment. But he fucked off...for a time. Now he's come back around, fishing, looking for something. This time he wanted to bait me with something from the Palfrey case in what had to have been hours of research on his part. Does this guy ever sleep?
Our recent exchange, because I saved it this time. Ask yourself why he was able to send me an email after he'd been blocked, and why our previous correspondence vanished, it's at least a little odd and convenient for him:
If
you're done smearing me on Twitter and at Breitbart Unmasked, perhaps
we can work together on learning more about this Justice League blogger
SP Biloxi aka Monique Rawlings, who appears to live in Riverside,
California and what her connections to Jason Leopold are:
http://patrickjfitzgerald.blogspot.com/2007/06/whos-your-daddy.html#2477942675296556598
letter referenced in above article:
In an email, Jason Leopold, an investigative reporter and
owner of his upcoming online investigating reporting website called The Public Record wrote this on the day
of the verdict, "In less than 8 hours!! This is the 1st time racketeering
charges were ever used by the DOJ in a prostitution case." How can a jury
of twelve with only one vote unanimously found Ms.
Palfrey guilty of all charges under the RICO? The real question is that did the
jury understand the definition of RICO in relation to Ms. Palfrey’s charges?
...
In a twist in Ms. Palfrey’s case, I received tragic news
that all of us found shocking. On May 1, 2008, I received a text message from
Jason Leopold that Jeane [Ms. Palfrey] was found dead in her mother’s mobile
home in Florida
that morning in a shed. Jeane’s mother found her. Jeane hanged herself. Jason
confirmed this with the Florida
police. This was very devastating news to hear. The last email that I received
from Jeane was April 18, 2008, three days after the verdict. Jason did a phone
interview with Jeane [which will be released on his new website very soon] on
March 20, 2008. As the media pointed out that Jeane’s former employee [as I
written about this woman in one my articles on Jeane’s case], Brandy Britton
committed suicide in 2006. In my article on Newsinkling, on January 2006, Ms.
Britton’s home was raided, and she was accused of prostitution. She committed
suicide before her trial. Unfortunately, there is another former employee that
was attempting suicide. In Jeane’s last email to me, she revealed this:
....
from Jeane Palfrey
to Justice League
date Apr 18, 2008 1:27 PM
subject Jeane Palfrey...
Bil… for reasons which
will become apparent later next week, I would like for you to make
certain the
following information is broadcast widely, on the net and elsewhere.
Please use Jason, in particular to disseminate
this news. The Government – at trial –
wanted to publish the names of the remaining 120 to 130 women, as part
of their
and my ongoing humiliation (my opinion).
However on Tuesday, just before the verdict was announced Judge
Robertson
called counsel into chambers. He
informed them that he had received an anonymous letter from a former,
unnamed
escort, who stated she would commit suicide, if the names were released
publicly. Based upon this info,
Robertson summarily sealed the records, on all remaining escorts’
identities. –Jeane PS Bil – Thanks for all the support and research.
Keep fighting the good fight.
.....
Finally, the entire defense team of Jeane [Ed.--Rawlings is a self-appointed whatchamacallit for all occasions, she had no right speaking for me, but I was upset] is all devastated of
her death. Jason and I had gotten to know Jeane as well as trying to get to bottom
of her case. This case was very personal to me as I got to know Jeane as a
person since May 2007. So, I decided to break some of my silence regarding
Jeane's case. I not only corresponded with Jeane on email about her side of the
story [written fifteen articles for Newsinkling] on why she was targeted by the
government and why she was charged with RICO on a selected prosecution case,
but Jason and I got the privilege to meet Jeane for the first time in a dinner
meeting in December 2007 in Los Angeles, CA. She is a lot different in person
than she is on TV. In December 2007, I was privileged to be part of Jeane's
legal team until the beginning of her trial doing legal research on her case. I
had gotten to work with her former attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley, her
current attorney Preston Burton and his legal team, and other investigators.
comments at public record by sp biloxi
Also,
Please IMMEDIATELY remove the pictures you re-posted without permission from the TO article.
Reply
http://cafewhispers.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/surprise-surprise-howard-lies/#comment-19500
siouxZ
No one here in Australia seems to
realize that David Hicks gave an exclusive interview to Jason Leopold to
weeks ago. The story he wrote is very sad and the Question and Answer
interview is eye opening. The two Guantanamo guards really make the
story. I can’t believe this wasn’t reported here. Here are the links and
an extract:
siouxZ
See these stories by Leopold that the Australian mainstream media ignored, which inspired the SMH reports:
| Matt Janovic |
| 2:30 PM (1 hour ago)
|
You seem to have all the answers, Ron, and that's an awful lot of research there--why all of the interest?
What interests me is how someone
I blocked can still send me emails. And, when I blocked them, all
previous emails between us conveniently (for you) vanished from my
archives. I don't have time for your reindeer games, you already
poisoned the well.
If
you're a police informant working legit cases and subjects, my hat's
off to 'ya, that's where it's needed. However, if this is just more
disinforming and disrupting, the classic American kind, I don't want to
know, and yes, it will all catch up to you in the end when you're of no
use...like William O' Neal. Look at my blog if you haven't already about
her, that's all I know. She was a mole for the fucker. Riverside is a
shithole.
I
will give you one tip only, but again, on my blog: she mentioned
something about working at Amway, yes, that one. The rest, no idea, but
besides, this is all a "hoax," I have no contact with any of those
assholes. I slam all of them in my account as users, losers, maybe even
someone's spies, just not govt. or law enforcement, probably partisan
ones. Either way, Rawlings isn't who she says she is, whatever that
means. Everything in this email can be found on my blog or elsewhere,
you've found more than I would have cared to since Rawlings was of some
significance to the DC Madam case to a point, but only so far. She
approached Palfrey, the reverse was true for me. I was approached based
on observations on the case that were spot-on, there was some
Machiavellian aspects to me being brought on board. Either way, I helped
a defendant who was guilty but wasn't being afforded their rights to
due process, period.
Whether
my book goes wide or not, sells shitloads, whatever, is irrelevant. The
information will be out there across several platforms. Pinocchio
(Bastone) will be sweating a little bit since I've got his number in
excruciating detail. He and Jeffrey Taylor are felons for releasing the
warrant-affidavit online, an unsigned federal LE document, still posted
on the very first article from Oct 2006--right before the midterms that
washed the GOP out for time, no coincidences there.
But
yes: how does someone prove they're not an informant? I've been told I
was one simply because I won't tow the line about Palfrey's death--a
suicide, not murder by shadowy govt. operatives. There is no evidence of
that.
Another tidbit: Rawlings
said she was from NJ and that her mother was a legal clerk in a federal
court building, something like that. As you can tell, I have no loyalty
to her whatsoever or you wouldn't be pushing this shit under my nose at
all. You probably know this shit already.
The email from Palfrey to
Rawlings looks legit. These people are mercenaries. Rawlings pretended
to believe Palfrey was innocent for reasons that escape me.
On
the other hand, the accusations against you fit your erratic behavior.
You sure act a lot like a pig informant to me, and I've been studying it
for over two decades, reading the internal record, even having a few
run-ins with a couple in my day (they lost, incidentally, and went to
jail). Maybe you are, maybe not, but at this point who gives a shit when
someone behaves the way you do? At worst, you'll give me something
interesting to write about down the road one day, probably a character
in a short story...
PS:
I'm not "smearing" anybody and have a right to my opinions. You act
like an informant. Either way, you're making a bad case for yourself,
starshine. Who is SiouZ? No idea. I don't communicate with anyone who
was covering or part of the DC Madam scandal these days, I prefer it.
That's over.
|
|
| Matt Janovic |
| 3:12 PM (58 minutes ago)
|
PS: I captured the Breitbartunmasked page on you, knew it would be taken down.
|
|
| Ron Brynaert |
| 3:26 PM (44 minutes ago)
|
wow you really are looney have fun smearing me more....
|
|
| Matt Janovic |
| 3:33 PM (37 minutes ago)
|
Thanks for reminding me who the real loon is, and that Rawstory has a great case. Here's to NYPD intel kicking your ass to the curb.
|
|
Now: YOU fuck off. Don't write back or I will consider it harassment.
Postscript 06/15/2012: Ron/Roy sent me a Youtube clip of a Cheap Trick song. I don't even give a shit enough to look further on, but I'm assuming this is "Dream Police." "Using the term "smear" isn't a denial, incidentally, and I'm entitled to my opinion, you put yourself in the public eye and continue to in a way that's unacceptable. Was daddy-o ever called "Hank the Crank"?
Say, "I'm not a police informant" online, write it, and say it under oath some time. Then I might start believing it ain't so. That still leaves you with coming off as completely batshit, a nutty bunny. Regardless, blow, and not me, for the love of God. You're no Sidney Reilly, more William O' Neal. I wouldn't be surprised if you ended up the same way: throwing yourself in front of a car, or jumping out of a window. That's how more than a few CIs end up, at their own hand.
And, hey, if I's wrong, bawss, fuhgedaboutit, you're not Henry Hill either.
I should add here that I knew someone who was working Kim's Video when you were there. That's being looked into more deeply, for yucks, and I have the time and motive now, so add one more who's investigating your background. Again, thanks, I needed a spastic crank to base a fictional character off of...
At least the Rawstory folks get some kind of entertainment and vindication watching your activities online, so keep digging that hole down into the archaeological remains of the Five Points looking for your namesake. Roy claimed, not really knowing shit, that the DC Madam case was a "hoax," more of his bilge emanating from the keypad. Whose "hoax": yours, Jeffrey Taylor's, or Palfrey's? I don't see Senator Vitter, Randall Tobias, Dick Morris, and the rest of the Lollipop Guild viewing the scandal as that, not even Kyle Foggo, Brent Wilkes, and a cast of thousands in defense and intelligence contracting.
Oh yeah: fuck you for having a problem with Occupy Wall Street, you fucking piece of establishment shit. Now hurry up and hit the fucking bottom that's been calling out to you your entire life.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment