tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32294008.post7006814256322646778..comments2023-04-18T09:58:42.054-04:00Comments on J to the Power of 7: Yesterday was Arlen Specter Day: New JFK ASSASSINATION FOOTAGE SURFACES THAT FINISHES-OFF "MAGIC BULLET THEORY"Matt Janovichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02700158612127533221noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32294008.post-84690223006771019972007-02-20T19:26:00.000-05:002007-02-20T19:26:00.000-05:00Yes, I've heard this theory, and it's pregnant. A ...Yes, I've heard this theory, and it's pregnant. A very possible thing, and it provides a quandry on the evidentiary side. The abilty to kill someone with ice-bullets surely dawned on SOMEBODY at least as early as the advent of cartridges and refrigeration. Dry ice would work fine too. Thanks for the links. Why, YOU should type the Bernstein article up sir! Hop-to-it! ;0)Matt Janovichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02700158612127533221noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32294008.post-51935425376981313642007-02-20T15:13:00.000-05:002007-02-20T15:13:00.000-05:00Btw - the bullet hole in Kennedy's back NEVER WENT...Btw - the bullet hole in Kennedy's back NEVER WENT THROUGH, according to the early medical reports. See this set of quotes for how puzzled the doctors were to have found a wound of entrance, but no wound of exit, and no bullet in the wound. I mean, bullets don't typically fall out - they go in and stay in, or go through. One FBI observer at the autopsy thought this was so interesting he speculated that perhaps an ice bullet had been used, which would account for the hole in the back and disappearance of the bullet. The "fact" of the bullet passing through the body did not surface until it became politically necessary to fit the lone assassin scenario.<BR/><BR/>See <A HREF="http://www.realhistoryarchives.com/collections/assassinations/jfk/icebulls.htm" REL="nofollow">The Tell-Tale Back Wound</A> for snippets of testimony from the various doctors and FBI agents present while Kennedy's back was examined.<BR/><BR/>Also - very much on this same topic, see <A HREF="http://realhistoryarchives.blogspot.com/2007/02/dangers-of-wikipedia.html" REL="nofollow">my post today</A> re the Dangers of Wikipedia as I discuss the CIA's control of the media and the Pike Committee's confrontation with the CIA in that regard. Btw - I have the full 16-page article by Bernstein. I wish the whole thing were on the net, but in all these years no one has taken the time to retype.Real History Lisahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14097712043872228470noreply@blogger.com